622 Personality in Political Psychologyits elements in an overly formalistic sequence; that I, the author,
have forced the subject of personology into the procrustean bed
of theoretical predilections, drawing on tangential topics of little
or no relevance. If such a case be valid, I regret that my habit of
seeking bridges between scientific domains has led me to cohere
subjects best left disparate. It is hoped that this philosophic prej-
udice, obviously inspired by a personally driven world view, will
yet prove to have a modicum of empirical merit and theoretical
value. (p. 177)REFERENCESAdorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford,
N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper &
Row.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.
New York: Holt.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statisti-
cal manual of mental disorders(4th ed.). Washington, DC:
Author.
Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure.Scientific American,
19,31–35.
Barber, J. D. (1965). The lawmakers: Recruitment and adaptation to
legislative life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Barber, J. D. (1992). The presidential character: Predicting perfor-
mance in the White House(4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall. (Originally published 1972)
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: The-
ory, research, and managerial applications(3rd ed.). New York:
Free Press.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Human nature and individual differences: The
evolution of human personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John
(Eds.),Handbook of personality: Theory and research(2nd ed.,
pp. 31–56). New York: Guilford.
Choiniere, R., & Keirsey, D. (1992). Presidential temperament: The
unfolding of character in the forty presidents of the United
States. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New
York: Academic Press.
Davies, J. C. (1973). From where and where to? In J. N. Knutson
(Ed.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 1–27). San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dille, B., & Young, M. D. (2000). The conceptual complexity of
Presidents Carter and Clinton: An automated content analysis of
temporal stability and source bias. Political Psychology, 21,
587–596.
Erikson, E. H. (1969). Gandhi’s truth: On the origins of militant
nonviolence. New York: W. W. Norton.Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: W. W.
Norton.
Etheredge, L. S. (1978). Personality effects on American foreign
policy, 1898–1968: A test of interpersonal generalization theory.
American Political Science Review, 72,434–451.
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. London:
Routledge.
Freud, S., & Bullitt, W. C. (1967). Thomas Woodrow Wilson: A
psychological study. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gangestad, S., & Snyder, M. (1985). “To carve at the joints”: On the
existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological
Review, 92,317–349.
George, A. L. (1969). The “operational code”: A neglected approach
to the study of political leaders and decision-making. Interna-
tional Studies Quarterly, 13,190–222.
George, A. L., & George, J. L. (1956). Woodrow Wilson and Colonel
House: A personality study. New York: John Day.
George, A. L., & Stern, E. (1998). Presidential management styles
and models. In A. L. George & J. L. George,Presidential person-
ality and performance(pp. 199–280). Boulder, CO: Westview
Press.
Glad, B. (1996). Passing the baton: Transformational political lead-
ership from Gorbachev to Yeltsin; from De Klerk to Mandela.
Political Psychology, 17,1–28.
Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia
Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I [On formally undecid-
able propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems I].
Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38,173–198.
Greenstein, F. I. (1969).Personality and politics: Problems of evi-
dence, inference, and conceptualization. Chicago: Markham.
Greenstein, F. I. (1973). Political psychology: A pluralistic universe.
In J. N. Knutson (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology
(pp. 438–469). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greenstein, F. I. (1987). Personality and politics: Problems of evi-
dence, inference, and conceptualization(New ed.). Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Greenstein, F. I. (1992). Can personality and politics be studied sys-
tematically?Political Psychology, 13,105–128.
Greenstein, F. I. (2000). The presidential difference: Leadership
style from FDR to Clinton. New York: Free Press.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York:
Free Press.
Hermann, M. G. (1974). Leader personality and foreign policy
behavior. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), Comparing foreign policies:
Theories, findings, and methods(pp. 201–234). New York:
Wiley/Sage-Halsted.
Hermann, M. G. (1980). Explaining foreign policy behavior using
the personal characteristics of political leaders. International
Studies Quarterly, 24,7–46.
Hermann, M. G. (1986). Ingredients of leadership. In M. G. Hermann
(Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 167–192). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.mill_ch24.qxd 9/25/02 11:36 AM Page 622