51813_Sturgeon biodioversity an.PDF

(Martin Jones) #1
Table 1(Continued).

Species Chromosome DNA content in Ploidy, n Reference
numbers Pg (according to the
DNA content)


Far East and China
A. mikadoi(A. medirostris mikadoi)
Tumnin (Datta) River [500?]^3 14.20^216 Birstein et al. (1993)
A. schrenckii


A. sinensis


Huso dauricus


Amur River [240?]^5 – – Sereberyakova (1970)


Yangtze River 264 ± – – Yu et al. (1987)
Amur River [120?]^5 – – Serebryakova (1969)


  • 3.78^24 Birstein et al. (1993)
    North America
    A. brevirostrum
    Florida and South Carolina, USA [360? or 500?]^3 13.08^2 12 (?) or 16 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    A. fulvescens
    Wisconsin [250?]^3 8.90^28 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    A. medirostris
    Washington [250?]^3 8.82^28 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    A. oxyrinchus desotoi
    Florida [120?]^3 4.55^24 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    A.o. oxyrinchus
    A. transmontanus
    San Francisco Bay, California, cell


Halifax, cell culture (99-112)^7 – – Li et al. (1985)


culture (230 ±)^8 – – Hedrick et al. (1991)


  • 9.55^28 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    Snake River, Idaho – 9.12^28 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    Columbia River, Washington – 9.59^28 Blacklidge & Bidwell (1993)
    Italy (aquaculture) 248±8 – Fontana (1994)
    subfamilyScaphirhynchinae
    Central Asia
    Pseudoscaphirhynchus kaufmanni
    Amu Darya River, Uzbekistan [120?]^3 3.47^24 Birstein et al. (1993)
    North America
    Scaphirhynchus platorynchus
    Illinois 112± 3.6^24 Ohno et al. (1969)
    Order Lepisosteiformes
    familyLepisosteidae
    North America
    Lepisosteus oculatus 68 ± 2.8^42 Ohno et al. (1969)
    L. osseus 56 – – Ojima & Yamano (1980)
    L. platostomus 54 – – Ueno (1985), cit. in Suzuki & Hirata
    (1991)
    Order Amiiformes
    familyAmiidae
    North America
    Amia calva 46 ± 2.4^42 Ohno et al. (1969)
    2.3^62 Mirsky & Ris (1951)


(^1) All species investigated karyologically so far are listed: the DNA content values for all species studied are given.
(^2) Determined by flow cytometry.
(^3) Chromosome number is assumed onthe basis of the DNA content.
(^4) Determined by microdensitometry of Feulgen-stained nuclei.
(^5) Only macrochromosomes were counted precisely.
(^6) Determined by the biochemical Schmidt-Thankauser method.
(^7) Chromosome number was determined in cardiac tissue cell culture.
(^8) Chromosome number was determined in cell cultures: the modal 2n in a spleen cell line was 219, and in a heart cell line, 237–243 (Hedrick
et al. 1991).
46 2.0^42 Suzuki & Hirata (1991)

Free download pdf