Side_1_360

(Dana P.) #1
mented model appear timely enough. Also, solu-
tions based on the peer model may be imple-
mented right from the start by newly established
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that also have
ownership of the physical infrastructure, or in
the cases where the amount of non-IP traffic is
relatively small.

4 Control System for Optical


Networks: Generalised


Multi-protocol Label


Switching (GMPLS)


Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) was
launched only a couple of years ago but has now
become a fundamentally important technology
in the Internet. Several of the largest Internet ser-
vice providers employ MPLS in their networks,
virtual private network (VPN) services based on
MPLS are now available and the majority of
high-end routers now support MPLS [4]. MPLS
is an IP-centric protocol at the same time that it
is independent of the IP framework. It is a stan-
dardised solution to place the handling of traffic
as much as possible down to Layer 2, i.e. per-
form “switching” instead of “routing”. This cir-
cumvents the major of the shortcomings of IP as
it simplifies routing processes, provides efficient
and reliable handling of larger traffic volumes,
as well as enabling traffic engineering, faster
restoration, and easier QoS handling.

Packets are classified in flows (Forwarding
Equivalence Class, FEC) where the same routing
decision is applied. Label switching comprises
mainly the allocation of a stack of labels to each

packet (flow) where each label refers to a differ-
ent network layer within a hierarchical network.
The label can be “deciphered” to a forwarding
port by each router according to a frequently
updated routing table and a new label attached
giving forwarding directions to the next router.
Routing and signalling protocols are a part of the
process in order to discover the network topol-
ogy, place and respond to requests, reserve and
establish paths. MPLS is presented in detail in a
separate article in this edition of Telektronikk,so
that we can close this short introduction to it
here.

The main principle behind MPLS has a lot in
common with inherent features of wavelength
routed optical networks. Indeed, optical network
elements with interfaces that can recognise
wavelength, such as optical add-drop multiplex-
ers, de-multiplexers and cross-connects – can
direct the optical signal based on its wavelength
without the need for reading the content of the
signal. This is clearly a form of label switching
[5]. The optical label is in a different domain
(optical) than the signal itself (electrical). This
aspect makes wavelength the perfect label since
no overhead is added to the signal. The analogy
between MPLS networks and optical wave-
length-routed networks is shown in Table 1.

Responding to the clear mismatch between the
transmission capacity of the fibre and the pro-
cessing capacity of routers, the Internet Engi-
neering Task Force (IETF) has more recently
proposed and is developing an extension of
MPLS – Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) – to the
time and the optical domain. The aim is to
achieve a more flexible labelling and forwarding
mechanism that uses a generalised label, which
is applicable to a variety of technologies and net-
works. For IP routers the labels designate princi-
pally input and output ports. For an OXC they
designate input and output ports as well as wave-
length, or band of wavelengths. The hierarchy of
different labels in GMPLS is schematically
shown in Figure 3.

The main aims of GMPLS are to [6]:
i provide a framework for real time provision-
ing of optical channels;

ii adopt optical technology and encompass the
development and deployment of a new class
of programmable OXCs;

iii allow the use of uniform semantics for net-
work control in hybrid networks that consist
of both OXCs and label switching routers.

Using GMPLS, an end-to-end optical channel
can be established between two end-nodes by
choosing a) a physical path that connects these

MPLS Optical Wavelength Routed Network

Label Switched Path (LSP) Optical Channel (OCh)
Label Switching Router (LSR) Optical Cross-Connect (OXC)
Selection of Labels Selection of λ’s (possibly in combina-
tion with OXC ports)

Table 1 Analogy between
MPLS and Optical Wavelength
Routed Network


Time-
slot

Wave-
length

Figure 3 A schematic of the Band Fibre Bundle
hierarchy of labels in GMPLS

Free download pdf