22 Wednesday January 26 2022 | the times
News
IN THE TIMES
TOMORROW
Accidents that involve self-driving cars
should be the legal responsibility of
motor manufacturers and not drivers,
experts have told ministers.
A report today from law commis-
sioners covering England, Wales and
Scotland calls for parliament to regu-
late vehicles that can drive themselves.
There is a “clear distinction”, it says,
between features that assist drivers —
such as adaptive cruise control — and
vehicles that were fully self-driving.
Under their proposals, when a car is
authorised by a regulatory agency as
having “self-driving features” and those
features are in use, the person in the
driving seat “would no longer be
responsible for how the car drives”.
Instead, the company or body that
obtained the authorisation — most
likely a manufacturer, referred to in the
Self-drive car makers ‘to blame for crashes’
law as an authorised self-driving
entity — would face sanctions in cases
of accident or malfunction.
The report from the commissions
highlighted that in the near future
features to help drivers “will develop to
a point where an automated vehicle will
be able to drive itself for at least part of
a journey”. In those circumstances, the
authors said, human motorists would in
theory not be required to pay attention
to the road and surrounding vehicles.
In addition to cars driving them-
selves on motorways, the report high-
lighted the potential introduction of
shuttle buses that were programmed to
navigate specific routes without the ac-
tive involvement of a driver. In those in-
stances, the commissions called on
ministers to implement a bespoke
system of legal accountability.
Under new legislation, the report
said the person in the driving seat
would no longer be a driver but a “user
in charge” who could not be prosecuted
for offences that “arise directly from the
driving task”.
The legal regime would give those in
charge immunity from offences includ-
ing speeding, passing a red light and
even dangerous driving.
The report added, however, that a
user in charge would retain other
“driver duties”, such as carrying insur-
ance, checking loads and ensuring that
children wore seat belts. Under the pro-
posed law, authorised self-driving enti-
ties would have legal responsibility for
accidents and motoring offences.
The report said that under the sug-
gested legal reform, if a self-driving
vehicle moved in a way that would be
considered criminal or unsafe if per-
formed by a human driver, an “in-use
regulator” would work with manufac-
turers to rectify the problem. In the
meantime, regulatory sanctions would
be available.
Law commissioners drew a distinc-
tion between self-drive vehicles that
retained driver’s seats for a user in
charge, and those that were authorised
to drive themselves without anyone in a
driver’s seat. In the latter configuration,
occupants would simply be passengers.
Instead of having a user in charge, a
“licensed operator” would be responsi-
ble for overseeing the journey. Under
the reforms, users in charge would be
required to be licensed drivers so that
they could take over if necessary.
Mike Hawes, chief executive of the
Society of Motor Manufacturers, said
the commission’s recommendations
“will put Britain in the vanguard of road
safety and automotive technology, by
providing a framework for the use of
self-driving vehicles which could save
thousands of lives”.
Jonathan Ames Legal Editor
Debt fears as Klarna launches credit card
Klarna is to launch a credit card in the
UK, allowing customers to use its “buy
now, pay later” service at high street
stores as well as online.
The Swedish fintech company said
the move would give consumers the
flexibility to pay for purchases at a later
date “without the inherent risks of in-
terest and revolving credit”.
However, the decision is likely to
raise concerns among debt charities,
who have warned that buy now, pay
later services encourage people to
spend beyond their means.
The Klarna Visa card will allow for
payment on purchases to be delayed
for up to 30 days, with no interest
charged on the balance or fees levied
for late payment. If customers do not
clear the debt in full after that time,
however, they risk having their credit
rating downgraded and debt collectors
appointed.
Standard credit cards usually offer an
interest-free period of a month and
charge interest on late payments, typi-
cally between 15 and 30 per cent. Credit
card holders must typically clear a
small proportion of their debt each
month and are charged a fee if they do
nor.
Alex Marsh, head of Klarna UK, said:
“Consumers are rejecting credit prod-
ucts that charge double-digit interest
rates while allowing repayments to be
put off indefinitely. For online purchas-
es where credit makes sense, buy now,
pay later has become the sustainable
alternative, with no interest [charged]
and clear payment schedules. “
He added: “The launch of Klarna
Card in the UK brings those benefits to
the offline world.”
Klarna said that its card would be
made available “progressively” over the
coming months. It said that 400,000
consumers had already signed up to a
waiting list, showing “strong demand
for a new approach to credit”.
DAVID WIGHTON
When work becomes a game
MAIN PAPER
BUSINESS
THE TABLE
SPORT
BREAD SNOBBERY
Make sure you’re eating
the right loaf
PULLOUT
20 LONG YEARS
Can Brazil end their wait for
the World Cup?
MAIN PAPER
COMMENT
IAIN MARTIN
For the Brexiteers, Johnson
has served his purpose
MAIN PAPER
Andrew Ellson
Consumer Affairs Correspondent