Case Studies in Knowledge Management

(Michael S) #1
Developing a Knowledge Management Strategy 125

Copyright © 2005, Idea Group Inc. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written


  • Foster a workplace that lends itself toward continuous improvement versus
    policing or auditing of organization information. The ideal workplace would
    be where peoples’ growth and participation occur within the framework of
    open teamwork, collaboration, and open flow of new ideas. This way, a link
    exists between the bottom and top of the organization. Address leadership
    styles and determine which leadership style is appropriate for which situation
    (situational leadership).



  1. Create a KM Executive Board to oversee KM implementation activities. The KM
    Executive Board will include community-wide members whose major role is to
    define the AFMC KM requirements. Create a KM Executive Board Charter. Start a
    focused pilot (business case development, lessons learned deployment, strategy,
    etc.). AFMC leadership needs to know and participate on the Board, chaired by the
    Deputy AFMC Commander. The AFMC Chief Learning Officer (CLO) should serve
    as the liaison between the integration team and the KM Executive Board. The
    responsibilities of the Board should include:


Endorsing mechanisms for transferring knowledge within the organization, includ-
ing creating a knowledge map, providing mentoring programs, encouraging job
transfers, and holding knowledge fairs.

7A. Approving the use of Rapid Improvement Teams (RITs) to work complex
issues that the community is either unable to agree on a remedy or for which
attempted remedies have not worked. The integration team should recommend
RIT campaigns as a part of its activities. The CLO would serve as the RIT
sponsor and bring RIT recommendations to the KM Executive Board for
approval.


  1. Launch a reshaping mission by the AFMC Commander that links the KM strategy
    to the AFMC Acquisition and Sustainment Strategic Vision and Plan. The
    architecture for the KM capability must be explicitly linked to the business
    processes that are required to implement the AFMC KM Strategic Plan. Without
    this linkage, one of these two planning elements becomes irrelevant as a guide for
    achieving AFMC’s long-term interests. Establish a task force consisting of
    representatives from SAF/AQ, AFMC, and each center that will report to the
    Executive Board. The task force would rely on the collective ideas of many people
    throughout the AF community, using a number of approaches to obtain input from
    industry, academia, other federal agencies, members of the acquisition workforce,
    and employee unions. The task force deliverable should outline initiatives to make
    it easier and more efficient to manage, reshape the acquisition workforce, and
    advance the current AFMC program to share best practices within the AFMC
    acquisition workforce. By documenting the deficiencies in the availability of core
    knowledge; the effectiveness of knowledge capture, storage, and retrieval sys-
    tems; and the adequacy of personnel skills and attitudes, AFMC will be able to
    establish tailored remedies that will provide the most efficient knowledge manage-
    ment capability to its members, partners, and customers. The task force should
    work in concert with the AFMC internal KM team’s objectives.

Free download pdf