TheEconomistJanuary29th 2022 Finance&economics 63have so far not come to pass. The great un
certainty with Omicron relates to whether
the  bad  (greater  transmissibility)  out
weighs  the  good  (lower  virulence),  and
thus whether there is a damaging surge in
hospitalisations and deaths from covid19.
So  far,  though,  few  governments  apart
from  China’s,  which  is  still  wedded  to  its
zerocovid  strategy,  seem  to  believe  that
additional  drastic  restrictions  on  people’s
movements are required. 
A  quantitative  measure  produced  by
ubs, a bank, ranks global restrictions from
zero to ten and finds that the average global
score  has  risen  from  3  to  3.5  in  recent
weeks. Only one rich country, the Nether
lands,  moved  into  a  proper  lockdown
(though this was relaxed on January 26th).
ubsalso  finds  that  the  share  of  interna
tional travel routes with covidrelated en
try restrictions, at 31% globally, has barely
budged since October.
More  people  also  seem  happy  to  take
risks.  Goldman  Sachs  produces  an  “effec
tive” lockdown index, which takes into ac
count  not  only  governments’  diktats  but
also people’s choices. So far its global index
has  tightened  to  about  the  same  level  as
during the Delta wave of last summer, de
spite four to five times as many daily infec
tions.  Even  in  places  where  the  rapid
spread  of  covid19  is  a  novelty,  people  are
largely carrying on as normal. Cases in San
Francisco were in the low double digits for
most of the autumn. Although the city now
averages about 2,000 a day, gyms and res
taurants remain busy. Our global “normal
cy index”, which looks at how people’s be
haviour  has  changed  relative  to  precovid
norms, dropped in recent weeks, but now
seems to be recovering. 
Today’s  case  numbers  suggest  that
about  510%  of  Americans  currently  have
covid19. Such high prevalence has created
a new difficulty that did not exist with pre
vious  variants:  a  widespread  absence  of
workers. According to a survey conducted
at  the  turn  of  the  year  by  the  Census  Bu
reau, 8.8m Americans were out of work ei
ther because they were caring for someone
withcovid19orbecausetheyhadthedis
easethemselves.Attheendof2021, 138 Na
tionalBasketballAssociationplayerswere
unabletoworkforcovidrelatedreasons,
thoughthisnumberhassincedropped.In
SanFranciscoa smallbutgrowingnumber
ofshops,whichhadalreadybeenstrug
glingwithalabourshortage,areclosing
earlyforlackofstaff.
Measuringtheeffectofsuchabsences
onoutputishard,butitlookslikelytobe
limited—andshortlived.Fora start,sever
alfactorsmightoffsettheirimpact.Some
oftheworkerswhoareisolatingwillbe
abletotoilfromhome.Ifa restaurantis
closed,prospectivedinersmaystillhave
otherplacestovisit.Andfora timeatleast,
coworkerswhoareuninfectedcantakeup
someoftheslack.Theoveralldragcould
thereforebemodest.Researchpublished
earlierthismonthbyJPMorganChase,an
otherbank,forinstance,speculatedthat
absencescouldreduceBritain’sgdpinJan
uaryby0.4%.
Moreover, withcase numbers falling
bothinBritainandinsomecitiesinAmer
ica,Omicron’seconomiceffectslooklikely
to faderapidly.Forwardlooking surveys
alsosuggestthatfirmsarenottooworried.
Thereislittlesign,forinstance,ofade
clineinbusinessconfidence(seechart2).
Despite a better overall performance
thanexpected,theglobaleconomicrecov
eryfromthelockdownsof 2020 isstillun
even.Thegapbetweenthebestandworst
performersisaswideasit haseverbeen.As
South Africa’s Omicron wave has col
lapsed,gdphasrisenandisnowinline
withitsprecrisistrend.Britain’seconomy
seemstoberecoveringfairlyquickly.
Otherplacesarestillstruggling,how
ever,whetherbecauseofa slowrolloutof
boosters, low population immunity or
plain badluck.Accordingto theoecd’s
measure, the Spanish economy is still
roughly7%smallerrelativetoitsprecovid
trend.Omicronhasnotdonetoomuchto
knock theglobaleconomic recovery off
course.Butsomeplacesstillfeela longway
fromnormal.nA minor infection
Weekly GDP, % change from pre-pandemic trend
Selected middle- and high-income countries*Sources: Nicolas Woloszko, OECD;
World Bank; The Economist *4 economies150-5-10-15-20
2020 21 22Invariant
Business-confidence index
Selected economies, 2008-21 average=100Source:OECD2106
104100
9894102962019 20 21United StatesBritainGermanyFrance
OECDGermanbankingRescue mission
W
hen in april2018 Christian Sewing
took over as chief executive of Deut
sche Bank few thought he would last very
long. The bank, one of Europe’s biggest by
assets, had been through four chief execu
tives in six years, and its very survival was
at stake. It was unable to make enough pro
fits to generate anything resembling a de
cent return for investors, and seemed to be
frequently  ensnared  in  costly  litigation.
There was talk of the bank being taken ov
er, and even wound down. 
Mr  Sewing  is,  impressively,  still  in  his
job—and  his  contract  was  extended  last
year, to 2026. On January 27th he presented
the bank’s annual results for 2021 at Deut
sche’s  headquarters  in  Frankfurt.  They
seemed to confirm that the lender has sta
bilised at last. Mr Sewing reported a pretax
profit  of  €3.4bn  ($3.8bn)  and  a  net  profit
of  €2.5bn  for  2021.  In  the  final  three
months  of  the  year  it  made  a  net  profit  of
€315m,  a  yearonyear  increase  of  67%,
beating analysts’ expectations. Across 2021
as a whole “we delivered our best result in
ten  years”,  said  Mr  Sewing.  Shareholders
seem  to  agree.  Since  its  record  low  in
March 2020, Deutsche’s share price has al
most doubled. 
Has Deutsche turned the corner? A year
after  he  took  over  Mr  Sewing  announced
his  grand  plan  for  saving  the  152yearold
bank that once financed Germany’s indus
trialisation.  It  would  be  “the  most  funda
mental transformation” of the bank in de
cades, he promised in July 2019. He said heB ERLIN
Has Deutsche Bank turned the corner?