TheEconomistJanuary29th 2022 Finance&economics 63
have so far not come to pass. The great un
certainty with Omicron relates to whether
the bad (greater transmissibility) out
weighs the good (lower virulence), and
thus whether there is a damaging surge in
hospitalisations and deaths from covid19.
So far, though, few governments apart
from China’s, which is still wedded to its
zerocovid strategy, seem to believe that
additional drastic restrictions on people’s
movements are required.
A quantitative measure produced by
ubs, a bank, ranks global restrictions from
zero to ten and finds that the average global
score has risen from 3 to 3.5 in recent
weeks. Only one rich country, the Nether
lands, moved into a proper lockdown
(though this was relaxed on January 26th).
ubsalso finds that the share of interna
tional travel routes with covidrelated en
try restrictions, at 31% globally, has barely
budged since October.
More people also seem happy to take
risks. Goldman Sachs produces an “effec
tive” lockdown index, which takes into ac
count not only governments’ diktats but
also people’s choices. So far its global index
has tightened to about the same level as
during the Delta wave of last summer, de
spite four to five times as many daily infec
tions. Even in places where the rapid
spread of covid19 is a novelty, people are
largely carrying on as normal. Cases in San
Francisco were in the low double digits for
most of the autumn. Although the city now
averages about 2,000 a day, gyms and res
taurants remain busy. Our global “normal
cy index”, which looks at how people’s be
haviour has changed relative to precovid
norms, dropped in recent weeks, but now
seems to be recovering.
Today’s case numbers suggest that
about 510% of Americans currently have
covid19. Such high prevalence has created
a new difficulty that did not exist with pre
vious variants: a widespread absence of
workers. According to a survey conducted
at the turn of the year by the Census Bu
reau, 8.8m Americans were out of work ei
ther because they were caring for someone
withcovid19orbecausetheyhadthedis
easethemselves.Attheendof2021, 138 Na
tionalBasketballAssociationplayerswere
unabletoworkforcovidrelatedreasons,
thoughthisnumberhassincedropped.In
SanFranciscoa smallbutgrowingnumber
ofshops,whichhadalreadybeenstrug
glingwithalabourshortage,areclosing
earlyforlackofstaff.
Measuringtheeffectofsuchabsences
onoutputishard,butitlookslikelytobe
limited—andshortlived.Fora start,sever
alfactorsmightoffsettheirimpact.Some
oftheworkerswhoareisolatingwillbe
abletotoilfromhome.Ifa restaurantis
closed,prospectivedinersmaystillhave
otherplacestovisit.Andfora timeatleast,
coworkerswhoareuninfectedcantakeup
someoftheslack.Theoveralldragcould
thereforebemodest.Researchpublished
earlierthismonthbyJPMorganChase,an
otherbank,forinstance,speculatedthat
absencescouldreduceBritain’sgdpinJan
uaryby0.4%.
Moreover, withcase numbers falling
bothinBritainandinsomecitiesinAmer
ica,Omicron’seconomiceffectslooklikely
to faderapidly.Forwardlooking surveys
alsosuggestthatfirmsarenottooworried.
Thereislittlesign,forinstance,ofade
clineinbusinessconfidence(seechart2).
Despite a better overall performance
thanexpected,theglobaleconomicrecov
eryfromthelockdownsof 2020 isstillun
even.Thegapbetweenthebestandworst
performersisaswideasit haseverbeen.As
South Africa’s Omicron wave has col
lapsed,gdphasrisenandisnowinline
withitsprecrisistrend.Britain’seconomy
seemstoberecoveringfairlyquickly.
Otherplacesarestillstruggling,how
ever,whetherbecauseofa slowrolloutof
boosters, low population immunity or
plain badluck.Accordingto theoecd’s
measure, the Spanish economy is still
roughly7%smallerrelativetoitsprecovid
trend.Omicronhasnotdonetoomuchto
knock theglobaleconomic recovery off
course.Butsomeplacesstillfeela longway
fromnormal.n
A minor infection
Weekly GDP, % change from pre-pandemic trend
Selected middle- and high-income countries*
Sources: Nicolas Woloszko, OECD;
World Bank; The Economist *4 economies
1
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
2020 21 22
Invariant
Business-confidence index
Selected economies, 2008-21 average=100
Source:OECD
2
106
104
100
98
94
102
96
2019 20 21
United States
Britain
Germany
France
OECD
Germanbanking
Rescue mission
W
hen in april2018 Christian Sewing
took over as chief executive of Deut
sche Bank few thought he would last very
long. The bank, one of Europe’s biggest by
assets, had been through four chief execu
tives in six years, and its very survival was
at stake. It was unable to make enough pro
fits to generate anything resembling a de
cent return for investors, and seemed to be
frequently ensnared in costly litigation.
There was talk of the bank being taken ov
er, and even wound down.
Mr Sewing is, impressively, still in his
job—and his contract was extended last
year, to 2026. On January 27th he presented
the bank’s annual results for 2021 at Deut
sche’s headquarters in Frankfurt. They
seemed to confirm that the lender has sta
bilised at last. Mr Sewing reported a pretax
profit of €3.4bn ($3.8bn) and a net profit
of €2.5bn for 2021. In the final three
months of the year it made a net profit of
€315m, a yearonyear increase of 67%,
beating analysts’ expectations. Across 2021
as a whole “we delivered our best result in
ten years”, said Mr Sewing. Shareholders
seem to agree. Since its record low in
March 2020, Deutsche’s share price has al
most doubled.
Has Deutsche turned the corner? A year
after he took over Mr Sewing announced
his grand plan for saving the 152yearold
bank that once financed Germany’s indus
trialisation. It would be “the most funda
mental transformation” of the bank in de
cades, he promised in July 2019. He said he
B ERLIN
Has Deutsche Bank turned the corner?