attributes that are meaningful to us: cost, comfort, style, han-
dling, reliability, and resale. We then weight each attribute by
assessing a relative importance to it. The weights must total 1.
To use a decision
matrix, you need to estab-
lish a scale for rating each
alternative for each attrib-
ute. (The example shown
uses a five-point rating
scale.) You must define
the scale so that everyone
has a common under-
standing of what each rat-
ing number—0, 1, 2, 3, 4,
5—represents. Once
you’ve established the relative weighting and the rating scale,
it’s merely a question of filling in the blanks to determine the
best alternative. In our example, using six weighted attributes
and a five-point scale, the Lincoln Town Car was determined to
be the best alternative.
Use of a weighted factor scoring model offers several advan-
tages:
- It allows for using multiple criteria, including financial
data. The attributes you select could include any combi-
64 Project Management
Weighted Factor
Scoring Model
The weighted factor scoring
model (decision matrix) is a compara-
tive method for selecting the preferred
alternative based upon certain prede-
termined attributes.Although it does
not provide absolute verification of jus-
tification, it offers a method for select-
ing among alternatives.
Mercury
Marquis
3
.45
Cost
(.15)
Comfort
(.25)
Style
(.10)
Handling
(.15)
Reliability
(.20)
Resale
(.10)
2
.50
2
.20
5
.75
4
.80
3
.45
1
.15
4
1.00
2
.20
4
.60
4
.80
3
.45
2
.30
3
.75
4
.40
4
.60
4
.80
4
.60
2
.30
3
.75
1
.10
5
.75
3
.60
3
.45
Total
Score
3.1
3.2
3.4
2.9
Attributes (Realtive Weighting)
Olds 98
Cadillac
deVille
Lincoln
Town Car
Alter-
native
Figure 4-4. Example of decision matrix