c09 JWBS043-Rogers September 13, 2010 11:26 Printer Name: Yet to Come
134 THE PHASE RULE
9.5 THE GIBBS PHASE RULE
Of theCmole fractionsXi(i= 1 , 2 , 3 ,...,C) in a many-component one-phase mix-
ture,C−1 are independent because once you knowC−1 of them, you can get the
remaining one from
∑
i
Xi=1. The “last” concentration variable is not independent.
If there arePcoexisting phases, there areC−1 independent concentration variables
in each phase for a total ofP(C−1). However, allPphases must be at the same
chemical potential for equilibrium to exist. This makesP−1 equations connecting
each component in each phase,^5 and there areCcomponents for a total ofC(P−1)
equations. The number of degrees of freedom is equal to the total number of inde-
pendent variablesP(C−1) in the system minus the number of equationsC(P−1)
connecting them. In the most general case of many components that may break up
into many phases, we have
f=P(C−1)−C(P−1)=PC−P−CP+C=C−P
Adding the two remaining degrees of freedom for the system, which might bepand
T, we have the celebrated Gibbs phase rule
f=C−P+ 2
A problem of potentially great complexity has been reduced to simple terms. The
number of degrees of freedomfof the system is equal to the number of components
minus the number of phases plus 2.
9.6 TWO-COMPONENT PHASE DIAGRAMS
Two-component phase diagrams can be complicated. Without the phase rule, they
would seem to have a bewildering array of unrelated behaviors. Many two-component
phase diagrams, however, can be broken down into combinations of three simple
diagrams that we shall label I, II, and III here. Two-component phase diagrams are
characterized by one more degree of freedom than pure one-component diagrams
because of the added composition variable
f=C−P+ 2 = 2 −P+ 2 = 4 −P
We can express composition in many ways, but the mole fraction of a two-component
system is most convenient for our purposes.
XB=
nB
nA+nB
(^5) For example,μA=μB=μCconnects three variables but has only two equal signs, hence only two
equations.