c13 JWBS043-Rogers September 13, 2010 11:27 Printer Name: Yet to Come
208 COULOMETRY AND CONDUCTIVITY
the contributions to◦as
◦KCl=λ◦K++λ◦Cl−
◦NaCl=λ◦Na++λ◦Cl−
..
.
and so on.
In this way, the difference found for
◦KCl−◦NaCl=◦KNO 3 −◦NaNO 3
would be merely the difference
◦KCl−◦NaCl=λ◦Na++λ◦Cl−−λ◦K+−λ◦Cl−
=λ◦Na+−λ◦K+
and would be the same for all pairs of sodium and potassium electrolytes because the
anions, Cl−,NO− 3 ,OH−..., would always cancel out. The same would be true for
pairs of electrolytes containing a common anion, because the cation would always
cancel out. In these and similar calculations, the integral charge on an ion must always
be taken into account so that the expression for Kohlrausch’s law of independent ion
migration is
◦=ν+λ++ν−λ−
whereνis the number of charges on each ion,ν=1 for the examples shown.
13.4 PARTIAL IONIZATION: WEAK ELECTROLYTES
So far we have considered mainly strong electrolytes, those for which ionization
is complete in aqueous solution. This is not always the case. Ionization of weak
electrolytes is partial. The usual example chosen is that of acetic acid for which
ionization at ordinary concentrations is very small. Examples of the vast difference in
behavior can be seen by comparing the Kohlrausch conductivity curves in Fig. 13.3
for HCl, which is completely ionized, with that of acetic acid (HOAc), which is not.
Ionization of HOAc does, however, rise rapidly in dilute solutions, and Kohlrausch’s
law of independent migration holds at infinite dilution. At infinite dilution, the weak
electrolyte HOAciscompletely dissociated (all electrolytes are), so we have a very
simple way of determining the approximatedegree of ionizationαat some finite
concentrationcby comparingto◦. We simply take the ratio
α=