Ackerman, P. L., Kyllonen, P. C., & Roberts, R. D. (1999).Learning and individual differences:
Process, trait, and content determinants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Associa-
tion.
Ainley, M. D. (1998). Interest in learning in the disposition of curiosity in secondary students: In-
vestigating process and context. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. Renninger, & J. Baumert
(Eds.),Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on interest and gender(pp.
257–266). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The inter-
play of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.),
Advances in motivation and achievement(Vol. 10, pp. 213–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Alexander, P. A. (2000). Toward a model of academic development: Schooling and the acquisi-
tion of knowledge: The sequel.Educational Researcher, 29(2), 28–33, 44.
Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to profi-
ciency.Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.
Alexander, P. A., Hare, V. C., & Garner, R. (1984). Effects of time, access and question type on
the response accuracy and frequency of lookbacks in older, proficient readers.Journal of
Reading Behavior, XVI, 119–130.
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). The role of importance and interest in the processing of
text.Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 89–122.
Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, in-
terest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,
87 , 559–575.
Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowl-
edge in academic performance.Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.
Alexander, P. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1991). Domain-specific and strategic knowledge as pre-
dictors of expository text comprehension.Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 165–190.
Alexander, P. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1994). Learning from physics text: A synthesis of recent
research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching[Special Issue on Print Based Language
Arts and Science Learning], 31 , 895–911.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowl-
edge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts.Review of Educational Re-
search, 64 , 201–252.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge af-
fects recall and interest.American Educational Research Journal, 31, 313–337.
Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). Profiling the differences in students’ knowledge, in-
terest, and strategic processing.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435–447.
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). What responses to domain-
specific analogy problems reveal about emerging competence: A new perspective on an old
acquaintance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 397–406.
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Woods, B. S. (1996). Of squalls and fathoms: Navigating the
seas of educational innovation.Educational Researcher, 25(3), 31–36, 39.
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D. (1997). College in-
struction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A
study of domain learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125–146.
Alexander, P. A., Pate, P. E., Kulikowich, J. M., Farrell, D. M., & Wright, N. L. (1989). Do-
main-specific and strategic knowledge: Effects of training on students of differing ages or
competence levels.Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 283–325.
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in
learning and literacy talk about knowledge.Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.
Alexander, P. A., Sperl, C. T., Buehl, M. M., Fives, H., & Chiu, S. (2002, June).Modeling do-
main learning: Profiles from the field of special education. Manuscript submitted for publica-
tion.
- MODEL OF DOMAIN LEARNING 295