Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition : Integrative Perspectives On Intellectual Functioning and Development

(Rick Simeone) #1
single exposure to a model’s performance but instead generally requires re-
peated observation, especially across variations in task such as seeing a series
of articles by the editor (Rosenthal & Zimmerman, 1976). A novice’s motiva-
tion to learn at an observational level is greatly enhanced by positive vicari-
ous consequences to the model, such as news awards given to the editor. Al-
though vicarious consequences can motivate without necessarily producing
affect, there is evidence that they can also lead to emotional conditioning
(Bandura & Rosenthal, 1966). Observers’ perception of similarity to a skilled
model and perception of positive consequences to a model will increase their
motivation to develop the skill further (Brown & Inouye, 1978). There is evi-
dence (Bandura, 1997; Zimmerman, 2000; Zimmerman & Rosenthal, 1974)
of observational learning of a wide variety of academic, sport, and work skills
from both live and symbolic (recorded or described) models. In addition to
task skills, observers typically acquire self-regulatory processes, such as ad-
herence to performance standards, motivational orientations, and task val-
ues. For example, journalist models who edit their articles extensively for er-
rors in grammar or accuracy helps observers to discriminate and rectify
common errors in their own work. Motivationally, this coping model also
conveys the high value placed on journalistic quality (Zimmerman & Koussa,
1979) and the need to persistently revise in order to improve the quality of
one’s own work (Zimmerman & Ringle, 1981).
At the second social cognitive marker or emulation level of self-regulation,
a novice learns to duplicate a model’s response on a corresponding task,
which typically involves emulating a model’s general pattern or style of func-


  1. SELF-REGULATION 335


TABLE 12.1
Multi-Level Features of Self-Regulation

Features of Regulation

Levels of
Regulation


Sources of
Regulation

Sources of
Motivation

Task
Conditions

Performance
Indices


  1. Observation Modeling Vicarous rein-
    forcement


Presence of
models

Discrimination


  1. Emulation Performance
    and social
    feedback


Direct–social
reinforce-
ment

Correspond to
model’s

Stylistic dupli-
cation


  1. Self-control Representation
    of process
    standards


Self-rein-
forcement

Structured Automaticity


  1. Self-regulation Performance
    outcomes


Self-efficacy
beliefs

Dynamic Adaptation

Note. From Table 1.1 in “Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence”
by B. J. Zimmerman, 2003, in F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.),Academic motivation of adolescents
(Vol. 2, p. 5). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Copyright by Information Age.

Free download pdf