Interpretation of findings| 1998.6 Interpretation of findings
When investigating dying or dead birds, remember that a “diagnosis” is not nec-
essarily the objective. As was explained earlier, the proximate cause of death may
not be the most important finding, but the endogenous or exogenous factors,
thatcontributedto the bird’s demise. Apparently background findings of, for
example, parasitism or inactive gonads may also be of relevance, especially when
monitoring the health of an avian population.
Care must, therefore, be taken over terminology. A “diagnosis” is one thing,
the “cause of death” another. All findings need to be interpreted in the context of
1
Gross post-
mortem
examination
(see text)2
Tissues/
swabs for
microbiology
taken direct
to laboratory
or using
swabs +/–
transport
mediumToxicology3
Tissues for
cytology—
impression
smears/
touch
preparations
on micro-
scope slidesTissues or
portions of
organs frozen
at – 20 °C
(preferably
–70°C)Virology4
Tissues for
histology in
10%
buffered
formalinDNA studies5
Tissues for
transmission
electron-
microscopy
in glutaralde-
hyde (+/–
tissues for
scanning
electron-
microscopy)Tissues in
ethanol for
DNA finger
printing and
mitochondrial
DNA6
Other
samples, if
available, for
example,
heart blood
for smears,
serum; bone
marrow for
smears; gut
contents for
toxicologyRemains of
carcass for
chemical
analysis,
skeletal
studies or
deposition
in a Reference
CollectionDead BirdFresh or chilled whole carcass Frozen carcass (usually
following examinations
1, 2, 3 and 4. sometimes
5 and 6 on a fresh carcass)Sample taking during postmortemexamination of birds.
