46
B+W
COMMENT
Portraiture is one of the most intimate of genres. But, according to
Thomas Peck, there are two ways of approaching it – directly face on or
discreetly as an observer. Either way, the emotional intensity is compelling.
FACING FACTS
H
ave you ever really
spent time looking
at someone? Given
them a good deep,
searching, intense
look? Even with
loved ones – let alone strangers
- it is rare that we look someone
square in the face for a long
time. If you hold another
person’s gaze for more than a
fraction of a second it can get
quite awkward, both for you and
them. We tend to look away.
Looking at portraits means
we don’t have to look away. It’s
an important part of their
appeal. We are allowed to do
something that feels taboo in
ordinary life. With a portrait
there is no need to feel self-
conscious about our curiosity,
We can indulge. The person
looking back at us doesn’t
flinch, they hold our gaze.
There is no embarrassment.
This is portraiture’s greatest gift - we can indulge our curiosity.
At the risk of over-simplifying
what is of course a vast genre, I
suggest that there are essentially
two types of portraits, each with
a slightly different emotional
intensity for the viewer. There
is the complicit portrait – one
where there is eye contact
between spectator and sitter.
And there is the observed
portrait – where the image
describes a person, but there
is no contact.
The subject, unaware of the
photographer, reveals their
character and playfulness
through their actions.
Photograph by Alain Laboile.
46-49_Portraiture_180 ER/MB.indd 4646-49_Portraiture_180 ER/MB.indd 46 16/07/2015 11:5316/07/2015 11:53