Tropical Forest Community Ecology

(Grace) #1
Treefall Gaps and Plant Species Diversity in Forests 203

will determine the percentage that require gaps to
persist in tropical forests.
In addition, most studies have failed to consider
the per capita impact of gaps on size- or age-
specific rates of reproduction of species. For exam-
ple, if gaps increase light and allow shade-tolerant
trees to become reproductive or produce more
seeds while still in the understory, then they may
promote diversity by increasing fecundity, even if
per capita species diversity is not higher than in
non-ga psites (Schnitzer 2001). This as pect of the
ga phy pothesis has been neglected and may be
particularly relevant to herbs, herbaceous vines,
shrubs, and mid-sized trees – groups that do not
typically reach the canopy, but may depend on
treefall gaps to initiate reproduction (Gentry and
Dodson 1987, Levey 1988, Denslow 1990, Dirzo
et al. 1992, Goldblum 1997, Schnitzer and Carson
2000). For example, the fecundity of forest herbs
and shrubs may be substantially higher in gaps
than in nearby intact forest (Levey 1988, Denslow
1990, Dirzoet al. 1992, Goldblum 1997). On
BCI, these groups of understory plants consti-
tute around one third of the vascular plant flora
(Figure 12.4); when combined with lianas and
pioneer tree species, they represent 65% of all
plant species on BCI and the majority of the flora
in tropical forests worldwide (Gentry and Dodson
1987). Thus, gaps may maintain the majority of

22%

12%

11%

11%

10%

Forest herbs
Shrubs

Herbaceous
vines

34%

Shade-tolerant
trees

Pioneer
trees

Lianas

Figure 12.4 Percentage of species in different
vascular plant groups on Barro Colorado Island,
Panama. Data originally from Croat (1978) and
summarized in Schnitzer and Carson (2000).


the flora in many tropical forests when both repro-
duction and diversity are examined.To adequately
determine the role of treefall gaps in maintaining
species diversity, both the growth and survival of
species as well as their reproductive output must
be considered.

Shade-tolerant trees, lianas, and
treefall gaps

Although there are still only a handful of relevant
studies, gaps do not appear to have a strong
influence on the per area or per capita diversity
of shade-tolerant tree species. Typically, shade-
tolerant trees establish prior to gap formation
and are present as advance regeneration; thus,
processes that occur prior to gap formation prob-
ably determine the composition and abundance
of species that are available to take advan-
tage of a newly formed ga p(Uhlet al. 1988,
Brown and Whitmore 1992). Additionally, many
shade-tolerant tree species are limited by low seed
productionorpoordispersal,andthustheycannot
distribute sufficient propagules into newly formed
treefall gaps to take advantage of these ephemeral,
high resource environments (see Dallinget al.
1998, Hubbellet al. 1999, Brokaw and Busing
2000, Muller-Landau Chapter 11, this volume).
Finally, shade-tolerant tree abundance and diver-
sity may be reduced in treefall gaps if gap-
phase regeneration is co-opted by lianas or palms
(Schnitzeret al. 2000).
Shade-tolerant trees may have structural
characteristics that make them particularly sus-
ceptible to competition from lianas. Shade-
tolerant tree species grow slowly and are adapted
to maximize light interception by producing many
branches, which can act as trellises for lianas,
allowing them to climb and sometimes smother
shade-tolerant trees under a blanket of foliage.
Conversely, pioneer trees and palms have char-
acteristics that may allow them to shed or avoid
lianas, such as rapid growth, smooth or peel-
ing bark, and an unbranched, monopodial trunk
(Putz 1984b). While the severity of liana com-
petition may vary with tree species identity, with
lianas affecting some tree species or guilds more
than others (e.g., Putz 1984a, Peréz-Salicru pand
Free download pdf