Patterns of Herbivory and Defense in Tropical Forests 69
Predicted plant
responses
Episodic
Lower
Restricted
Lower
Lower
Higher
Water table Light availability
Physical
environment:
precipitation
Ecological driver of basic plant
phenological patterns
Resource
availability for
herbivores
(foliage)
Strongly seasonal:
Tropical dry forests:
(deciduous)
Plant responses
Slow
growth
Evergreen Rapid growth
Deciduous
Continuous
Higher
Continuous
Higher
Higher
Lower
Foliage availability
Risk of attack
Potential impact of herbivores
Selective pressure for defense
Investment in defense
Herbivory
Less seasonal:
Tropical rain forests:
(evergreen)
Figure 5.1 Diagrammatic model of the water availability/phenology hypothesis to explain how foliage availability
leads to a series of contrastin gresponses between plants of seasonally dry tropical forest (TDF) and ever green tropical
rain forest (TRF), regarding herbivory and defense. A further subdivision of TDF plants into deciduous and evergreen,
and TRF plants into rapid-growth and slow-growth species, shows relevant interspecific heterogeneity within each
major forest type, and size of boxes are indicative of the relative representation of these four types of plants.
Ascendin garrows indicate the predicted responses for plants of each of the four groups. See text for details.