plate (Table 12.1). For example, in the top data line
of the table, Pythium oligandrumwas detected in 18 (of
a total 28) different soil samples that were sprinkled
onto agar precolonized by Fusarium culmorum, but
P. oligandrumwas detected on only three plates pre-
colonized by Trichoderma, and on none of the agar
plates precolonized by Rhizoctonia. These data indicate
that different mycoparasites are selectively favored
by different “host” fungi – at least in laboratory
conditions.
A mycoparasite unique to Britain!
Well, that’s not exactly true. There is a mycoparasite
that has only ever been recorded in Britain, and it is
very common. Pythium mycoparasiticum(see Fig. 10.2)
is a relatively slow-growing parasite that has been
recorded frequently on precolonized agar plates, but
only if the soil is serially diluted with sand to dilute
out the spores of more aggressive mycoparasites,
which outcompete P. mycoparasiticumin “raw” soil
(Deacon et al. 1991). It almost certainly occurs in
many countries, and this example serves to illustrate
that other fungi await discovery by using novel isola-
tion techniques.
Pythium oligandrumas a biological control agent
Pythium oligandrum and the other mycoparasitic
Pythiumspp. have the potential to be used for biocontrol
of plant pathogens, especially as seed treatments to con-
trol seedling pathogens. In this respect, P. oligandrum
grows rapidly on cheap commercial substrates such as
molasses, and it produces large numbers of oospores
in shaken liquid culture. These oospores have been
applied to seeds of cress, sugar beet, and other crops,
using a commercial seed-coating process, and were
reported to give good protection against seedling dis-
ease caused byPythium ultimum in experimental con-
ditions (McQuilken et al. 1990). A commercial powder
formulation of P. oligandrumhas been developed in
the former Czech Republic. However, it is not used
widely, if at all, because of technical problems. The
major problem is that the oospores of P. oligandrum
germinate slowly and poorly because they exhibit con-
stitutive dormancy (Chapter 10). Only a maximum
250 CHAPTER 12
Table 12.1The ability of different mycoparasites to grow across colonies of other fungi on agar plates. (Data from
Mulligan & Deacon 1992.)
Number of soils yielding the
Mycoparasite Precolonizing fungus mycoparasite (max. 28)
Pythium oligandrum Fusarium culmorum 18
Trichoderma aureoviride 3
Rhizoctonia solani 0
Botrytis cinerea 12
Clonostachys rosea F. culmorum 20
T. aureoviride 27
R. solani 26
B.cinerea 25
Trichoderma harzianum F. culmorum 2
T. aureoviride 0
R. solani 22
B. cinerea 13
Papulasporasp. F. culmorum 0
T. aureoviride 11
R. solani 3
B. cinerea 19
Note: Soils were collected from 28 different locations in Britain and were stored air-dried. Twenty-eight plates of potato-dextrose agar
were inoculated with Fusarium culmorum, and similarly 28 plates were inoculated with Trichoderma aureoviride, Rhizoctonia solani, or Botrytis
cinerea. When these fungi had covered the agar plates a small amount of air-dried soil was added, and the plates were incubated
to detect any mycoparasites that grew across the fungal colonies. All the mycoparasites either grew completely across the established
fungal colonies or not at all. The results show that four mycoparasites are common in soil (detected in at least 18 of the 28 soils tested).
But, with the exception of Clonostachys roseawhich grew across any fungus, the different mycoparasites are selectively favored by dif-
ferent “host” fungi.