The Times - UK (2022-02-03)

(Antfer) #1

4 2GM Thursday February 3 2022 | the times


News


courses teaching beauticians, con-
firmed that he used Botulax.
At the start of the appointment he
presented consent forms for me to fill
in. They mentioned treatments with
Azzalure, a licensed product. Karklins
asked me to cross this name out and re-
place it with details of a Botulax pro-
duct. “It doesn’t matter,” he said. “It’s
just a brand different.”
Karklins said that Botulax was “bet-
ter” and “cheaper” than other products.
Clients in Wakefield did not want to pay
the same as those in London, he said.
Karklins also described a lip filler
treatment that he offered, suggesting
he performed this on clients as young as
16 or 17 when they came in with family
members. Last year it became illegal to
give fillers to under-18s, whether or not
they had parental permission.
We also had an appointment with
Samantha Bennett, an aesthetic practi-
tioner from Manchester who visits
people at home for anti-wrinkle injec-
tions. She suggested that I should have
11 injections in my face and offered to
use Innotox or ReNTox, botulinum
toxin products also from South Korea
that are not licensed in Britain.
She insisted that “nothing can go
wrong... it never has in the years that
I’ve been doing it”. During a phone call
to arrange the appointment, she said
Innotox was “like gold dust at the min-
ute — everyone has gone mad for it”.
In total, a colleague and I attended
three in-person appointments with
practitioners across the north of
England and confirmed they were us-
ing an unlicensed product. In each case,
we made excuses to leave before having
any treatments. The third practitioner,

Janine Walker, who runs Envy Esthet-
ics, in Preston, Lancashire, advertised
Botulax injections in a Facebook post.
She said Botulax had not been used in
her training but that she found the pro-
duct after reading reviews online. She
appeared to believe that it was licensed.
Walker, who did not use hard-selling
tactics, said that the lines on my face
were “very fine”. She warned about
possible side effects such as headaches.

There is no suggestion that any of the
practitioners botched treatments or
that any specific product is linked to
poor results or side effects. Problems
can be caused by other issues such as
bad hygiene or poor technique.
Save Face, a register of practitioners
that raises awareness of safety issues
and standards, said that it was increas-
ingly receiving reports of problems
caused by anti-wrinkle treatments.

Ashton Collins, director of Save Face,
said: “Either someone is knowingly
using an unlicensed product to cut cor-
ners and put profit before your safety,
which is outrageous, or they are so ig-
norant and unaware of what the legis-
lation and regulations are around med-
icines in this country.”
“Black-market” Botox was available
on the internet for non-medics to buy
from multiple sources. I posed as a

Case studies


V


ictoria Lee
says she is
“scarred for
life” after
botched
anti-wrinkle injections
at an acquaintance’s
house (Charlotte Wace
writes).
Lee, a make-up
artist from Essex, did
not believe there was
any reason to be
worried about the
treatment. Her
acquaintance said she
“always” had
treatment with the
practitioner. “Not for
one minute did I think
there was anything
wrong with it at all, I
really didn’t,” she said.
A week after the
treatment in 2020
marks began
appearing on Lee’s

face, right. These
became “worse and
worse” until they were
large lumps that
leaked blood and pus.
She could not go to
work and did not leave
her home for months.
“It was horrendous”,
Lee said. “I just got
fat, lethargic, tearful,
very down, I just cried
all the time.” Lee
contacted the
practitioner, who
eventually agreed to
put her in touch with
the supplier of the
product. The company
said it was unable to
help. “Whatever it was
they were using was
not what it should
have been,” Lee said.
She booked an
appointment with her
GP, who prescribed

antibiotics and
told her to see
a skin
specialist.
The areas
that had
been
injected
needed to be
drained and
biopsies were
carried out. Lee
now needs regular
injections to fill
indentations
that have
been left in
her face but
treatment
only works
to a certain
extent. “I
am scarred
for life. These
marks on my
face will never
go,” Lee said. “I’m 41

and I should be
in my prime.
I’ve now got a
job in a salon
three days a
week to get
me back out
there slowly.
But you’re
working in
front of a
mirror, all the
time. You can’t get
away from it.”
Elizabeth,
who is in her
fifties, visited
a beautician
for anti-
wrinkle
injections
after hearing
about her
from a “friend
of a friend”. But
there was no face-
to-face consultation

d
e

ee
gular

and I
in m
I’v
jo
th
w
m
th
Bu
wo
ffron
mirro
tttimeYo u

r
“I’m 41

Eli
who
fif
a
fo
w
in
af
ab
from
of a f
tthere w
ttto-face co

gular
ill

time. Yo u
away fr
Eli

At a beauty clinic above a high street in
Wakefield a man in scrubs counts 25
points on my face that he plans to inject
with an unlicensed anti-wrinkle drug.
The adjoining waiting room features
a vase filled with syringes instead of
flowers. The walls are decorated with
framed pictures of a swimwear model
and a former Mrs Universe.
Vilnis Karklins, who says he trained
as a doctor in Latvia but is not regis-
tered to practise in Britain, tells me that
I will need “loads” of jabs for my “very
deep” wrinkles. He suggests they make
me look five years older.
“Maybe stress or something else?
Partner? Maybe baby? You have baby?”
he asks. “Definitely it will be only in the
forehead 22 [injections]. And some, two
or three, around the eyes.”
Karklins works at the Face and Body
Aesthetic Clinic in Wakefield, West
Yorkshire. I will not be taking him up on
his offer. He is among those using social
media to advertise unlicensed versions
of Botox to young women on the cheap.
Licensed brands of botulinum toxin,
of which the best known is Botox, are
prescription-only drugs that have gone
through safety checks before being
deemed safe to use in the UK.
Legally, practitioners in Britain
should only be performing injections
with licensed products on people who
have had this prescribed by a registered
practitioner, such as a doctor or a nurse
with an additional qualification in this
area. The prescriptions should only be
made after an in-person consultation.
Karklins has offered to treat me with-
out a prescription. He wishes to use
Botulax, a South Korean product that is
not licensed in Britain.
Under the Human Medicines Regu-
lations 2012 it is unlawful to sell or sup-
ply an unlicensed medicine, which in-
cludes practitioners selling treatments
with these products. They have not
been sourced through an accredited
supply chain, so there is no guarantee
that vials of Botulax in Britain are not
counterfeit, with an unknown sub-
stance, or stored safely.
Karklins is among many practition-
ers whom campaigners suspect are us-
ing unlicensed products to cut costs or
bypass the prescription process. The
Times investigated after being warned
that “black market” Botox was becom-
ing rife across the beauty industry.
One organisation has reported re-
ceiving multiple complaints of botched
anti-wrinkle treatments every week.
Those who have complained include
women scarred for life, with hard and
painful lumps across their faces. Many
fear they were injected with unlicensed
or counterfeit products.
I made an appointment with Kark-
lins because he had referred to Botulax
on his TikTok profile when showing off
boxes of new stock. In one of his posts,
he displayed boxes with Botulax brand-
ing as decorations on a Christmas tree.
He offered to inject three areas of my
face for £145, about half the typical
price. The cost of having Botox varies
by location and the practitioner’s expe-
rience. I attended the Face and Body
Aesthetic Clinic last month with a male
colleague, who posed as my boyfriend.
Karklins, who also runs training


One practitioner urges


‘loads’ of jabs in a


growing market that


avoids medical rules,


Charlotte Wace reports


News Unlicensed treatments


‘Black market’ Botox, via social


times investigation Vilnis Karklins and
Samantha Bennett
offer advice on their
beauty treatments with
South Korean products
that are unlicensed
for use in the UK

Free download pdf