66 2GM Thursday February 3 2022 | the times
SportCricket
For all that England faced strong(er)
sides during the past calendar year, and
for all the restrictions imposed by
Covid in the past two years, the undeni-
able truth is that the Test team have
been drifting. There has been an
absence of leadership and authority at
the heart of the operation for which
Ashley Giles, the managing director
and the man ultimately responsible,
has now paid with his job.
It is never pleasant when people get
sacked, especially someone who has
given a considerable amount as player
and administrator, as Giles has, but in
this instance decisive action was neces-
sary after a shambolic Ashes tour. For
now Andrew Strauss, who was Giles’s
predecessor, steps into an interim role
before a permanent replacement is
sought.
It is inconceivable that there will be
no more casualties to follow and it was
a surprise that there was no mention of
Chris Silverwood’s position in the
announcement last night from the
ECB. Given the state of the team during
the Ashes, Silverwood’s position was
thought to be even more vulnerable
and it is hard to see how he will remain
in post given the loss of confidence in
his leadership on the tour.
There has been much talk of a “red-
ball reset” in the aftermath of the Ashes
thrashing and some more fundamental
changes to the structure of English
cricket may come in due course, but a
revamp of the leadership should help
bring some improvement immediately.
A lack of drive and purpose has been
evident, despite the continuing success
of the one-day team which rides high in
the rankings.
After the Ashes, Strauss was asked to
set up a panel to make recommenda-
tions on the back of a lengthy report
written by Giles. The panel of five were
in discussions twice last week, firstly
with Giles, and then again the following
day. Strauss then drew together the
recommendations and Tom Harrison
presented them to the ECB board of
directors on Tuesday. Given the lack of
cricket expertise on that board, a
rubber stamp was inevitable.
Giles has paid the price for the
decline in the performances of the Test
team principally and for failing to get
the big decisions around personnel and
structure right. This year nine Tests
were lost, a record, amid four consecu-
tive series defeats. There has been one
win in the past 14 Tests. Throughout, it
has been difficult to discern any
progression, culminating in a shocking
performance in the Ashes.
The responsibility for the results and
performance of the team should be laid
at the door of the captain and coach par-
ticularly, but in this Giles has found his
fortunes entwined with that of Joe Root,
the Test captain, and Silverwood. He
backed Root for the Ashes a long way
At least the future looks
F
or the first time
since 1998,
England have
reached the final of the
Under-19 Cricket
World Cup (Elgan
Alderman writes).
Awaiting them in
Saturday’s final in
Antigua is India.
Twenty-four years ago,
a side featuring Rob
Key, Chris Schofield,
Owais Shah and
Graeme Swann beat
New Zealand to
become junior world
champions. Here are
four of England’s
youngsters who can
also have big futures.
tom prest
The England captain
has excelled with his
batting and his
leadership. After James
Sales had been dear in
the semi-final, Prest
gave the ball to Ahmed
for that vital over and it
proved a masterstroke.
Prest, 18, who made
his debut for
Hampshire in all three
formats last season, is
England’s leading
runscorer, with a run-
a-ball 93 against
Canada and 154 not out
off 119 against UAE,
both from No 3. He has
taken five wickets with
his off spin.
rehan ahmed
The 17-year-old
Leicestershire leg
spinner with a ripping
googly does not fool
around. He has taken
four-wicket hauls in all
three of his
appearances.
He was expensive in
the semi-final win over
Afghanistan, conceding
41 runs from six overs,
but bowled England to
victory at the death.
Entrusted with the
penultimate over, with
Afghanistan needing 19
runs, Ahmed took the
key wicket of Noor
Ahmad and followed
up with two more
dismissals, only one
run coming off the bat.
jacob bethell
The 18-year-old from
Barbados, right, is
regarded as one of the
best talents in English
Giles had to go and
surely Silverwood
has to follow him
Mike Ather ton
Chief Cricket
Correspondent
out and Silverwood was his appoint-
ment as head coach in October 2019.
Giles not only handpicked Silver-
wood ahead of more able and experi-
enced candidates but then loaded more
responsibility on his shoulders than
any other England head coach of recent
memory by making him responsible for
selection, as well as coaching across
three formats, after the sacking of Ed
Smith last April. It is too much for one
man, no matter how capable.
With the Test team and one-day
team at different stages of their evolu-
tion, there is a need to consider differ-
ent coaching set-ups for different for-
mats. Giles was scarred by his own ex-
periences as England’s one-day coach,
when Andy Flower relinquished one-
day duties, and was reluctant to split the
role. This tied Giles’s own position to
the success or failure of Silverwood.
Of itself, creating a supremo-style
structure may not be a bad thing, but it
places greater emphasis on that supre-
mo being the right man and increases
the risk of upheaval if he is not. The old
system of a national selector, or
chairman of selectors, may have some
disadvantages too, especially if the
relationship between individuals is
problematic, as it was between Smith
and Giles. To solve a personality
problem, Giles changed the structure.
Giles was keen to pass off responsibil-
ity for the Ashes failure by emphasising
the structural weaknesses of county
cricket, the disadvantages of the sched-
ule and the limitations imposed by
Covid restrictions. While none of these
factors can be discounted — and
indeed elicit a great deal of sympathy —
Giles’s press conference in Sydney was
self-serving and his report is likely to
have been similarly so.
Giles would argue, perhaps fairly,
that Covid has placed more strain on
the system than any other director of
cricket has had to bear. Covid, and the
requirement to keep the game going for
financial reasons, has forced players
and coaches into bubbles that were suf-
focating in the early stages of the pan-
demic and have produced a weariness
since that impacted upon performance.
Giles would contend that these consid-
erations provide mitigation.
But the mistakes in the Ashes were
manifest and a well-intentioned desire
to rest and rotate has produced a team
with no solid spine or core. The limp
conclusion to the Ashes series suggest-
ed a team who had lost all motivation
and confidence. On what should have
been the last two playing days of the
match in Hobart, Giles was collating
opinion from senior players about the
tour in general and the leadership in
particular. It is unlikely to have made
pretty hearing.
Appointed in January 2019, Giles’s
term has been relatively short-lived,
like that of his predecessor but one,
Paul Downton. In between came
Strauss, who shapes as the king-maker
in an organisation bereft of cricket
knowledge. Strauss may be ready for a
more formal role than that of a non-
voting member of the board of direct-
ors, chairman of the cricket committee
and interim director of cricket. He is top
class and would be an asset in any role.
England in the Giles era
In Tests
In one-day internationals
In T20s
Played
38
Played
40
Played
43
Won
14
Drawn
7
Lost
17
Lost
11
No
result
4
No
result
1
Tied
1
Tied
1
Lost
14
Won
24
Won
27
113
4-0
Years since England had last
averaged fewer runs per wicket
(20.21) in an Ashes
Only three times have England
suffered a bigger Ashes defeat -
the 5-0 whitewashes in 1920-21,
2006-07 and 2013-14
852.3
Overs it took Australia to clinch
the series by winning the first
two Tests. Only twice - in 2001
and 1921 - has an Ashes series
been lost in fewer
England's next challenge
First Test v West Indies, Antigua,
March 8-12
Second Test v West Indies,
Bridgetown, March 16-20
Third Test v West Indies, Grenada,
March 24-28
Rory Burns is bowled first ball of the first Test, setting the tone for England’s 4-0