Week 13: Interference and Diffraction 445
Etot
E 0
r
r
φ
φ
φ/2
= 2
rsinφ/2
rsinφ/2
Figure 188: The phasor diagram forN→ ∞Huygens radiators distributed acrossa. The “phasor
snake” bends smoothly around into a circular arc of lengthE 0 , where we need to determine the
length of the secant that cuts across,Etot.
accumulated between the radii. From this we see that the arc lengthE 0 can be related
torby:
E 0 =rφ (1071)
If we drop a perpendicular bisector (dashed line) from the center of the circular arc to
the total field phasorEtot, we make two simple right triangles with vertex angleφ/2.
The opposite side of each of them has lengthrsin(φ/2) so that:
Etot= 2rsin(φ/2) (1072)
We substituter=E 0 /φinto this (eliminatingrin favor ofE 0 ) to get:
Etot=
2 E 0 sin(φ/2)
φ
=E 0
(
sin(φ/2)
φ/ 2
)
(1073)
Finally, we go through the usual ritual to convert the field amplitudes to intensities:
I 0 =
1
2 μ 0 cE
2
0 (1074)
so that:
Itot=
1
2 μ 0 c
Etot^2 =
1
2 μ 0 c
E^20
(
sin(φ/2)
φ/ 2
) 2
(1075)
or
Itot(θ) =I 0
(
sin(φ/2)
φ/ 2
) 2
. (1076)
This is what we have been trying to get – an exact formula for the intensity of the
diffraction pattern as a function ofθ(yes, it is actually given as a function ofφbut recall
thatφ=kasin(θ) so we also know it as a function ofθ, at the expense of a little extra
(and tedious, admittedly) arithmetic. But arithmetic isn’t tedious tohumans any more
as long as an equation can be programmed into a computer, and this one is easy to code.
At a glance, this equation has all of the right features. Atθ= 0 (and henceφ= 0) we
get an intensity ofI 0127. At all the other places where sin(φ/2) = 0, we get a minimum.
(^127) We avoid the problem of “division by zero” calculus-fashionby taking thelimit
xlim→ 0 sinx(x)=x−x
(^3) /3! +x (^5) /5!−...
x = 1−x
(^2) /3! +x (^4) /5!−...= 1