266 A strategyfor action to slowand stabiliseclimate change
2 More details in Watson, R.et al. (eds.) 2001.Climate Change 2001: Synthe-
sis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assess-
ment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, question 7. Also, Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.
et al. Global, regional and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation.
In Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., Pan, J. (eds.) 2001.Climate Change
2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assess-
ment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, Chapter 8.
3 More detail in Global Environmental Outlook 2000, UNEP. London:
Earthscan. Also eds. Tolba, M.K., El-Kholy, O. A. (eds.) 1992.The World
Environment 1972–1992. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 157–82.
4 See Tolba,The World Environment 1972–1992, p. 169.
5 FromGlobal Environmental Outlook 3 (UNEP Report). 2002. London:
Earthscan. pp. 91–2.
6 Bolin, B., Sukumar, R.et al. 2000. Global perspective. In Watson,Land Use,
Chapter 1. Also Salatiet al. 1991. In Jager, J., Ferguson, H. L. (eds.)Climate
Change: Science, Impacts and Policy; Proceedings of the Second World
Climate Conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 391–5;
also Leggett, J.et al. 1992. Emission scenarios for the IPCC: an update. In
Houghton, J. T., Callender, B. A., Varney, S. K. (eds.)Climate Change 1992:
the Supplementary Report to the IPCC Assessments. Cambridge: Cambridge
UniversityPress, p. 89; also Houghton,R. A. 1991.ClimateChange, 19 ,
pp. 99–118.
7 Bolin, B., Sukumar, R.et al. 2000. Global perspective. In Watson,Land
Use, Chapter 1, p 26.
8 Brown, S.et al. 1996. Management of forests for mitigation of greenhouse
gas emissions. In Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., Moss, R. H. (eds.) 1996.
Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate
Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II
to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Cli-
mate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 24. Simi-
lar areas have been quoted in Watson,Land Use, Policymakers Summary,
and also in Kauppi, P., Sedjo, R.et al. Technical and economic potential of
options to enhance, maintain and manage biological carbon reservoirs and
geo-engineering. In Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., Pan, J. (eds.) 2001.
Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to
the Third Assessment Report of the IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 4.
9 For definitionseeGlossary.
10 Betts, R. A. 2000. Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation
by decreases in surface albedo.Nature, 408 , 187–90.
11 From Policymakers summary. In Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J.,
Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C. A. (eds.)
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group
I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.