614 Notes to pp. 486– 487
42 Jürgen Habermas, Philosophisch-politische Profile, p. 175.
43 Various trends came together in the history of the reception and the
productive appropriation of Adorno’s philosophy and sociology. There is
no doubt that they have demonstrated their ability to make themselves
acceptable. Worth mentioning here are, on the one hand, cultural theory,
the different variants of the paradigms of interpretation and the Anglo-
Saxon developments in cultural studies. On the other, we find Habermas’s
idea of communication free from domination, Axel Honneth’s conception
of the ethics of recognition, and the post-structuralist critique of logocentrism
in Foucault and Derrida. See David Couzens Hoy and Thomas McCarthy,
Critical Theory.
44 Adorno, Negative Dialectics, p. 365.
45 See Barbara Merker, ‘Wozu noch Adorno?’, p. 489ff. and, especially,
p. 502ff.
46 Adorno, Hegel: Three Studies, p. 9.