References....................................................................
- (a) For general accounts of the development of quantum theory see: Mehra J, Rechenberg H
(1982) The historical development of quantum theory. Springer-Verlag, New York; Kuhn TS
(1978) Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity 1894–1912. Oxford University
Press, Oxford. (b) An excellent historical and scientific exposition, at a somewhat advanced
level: Longair MS (1983) Theoretical concepts in physics. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, chapters 8–12 - A great deal has been written speculating on the meaning of quantum theory, some of it serious
science, some philosophy, some mysticism. Some leading references are: (a) Whitaker A (1996)
Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (b)
Stenger VJ (1995) The unconscious quantum. Prometheus, Amherst, NY. (c) Yam P (June
1997) Scientific American, p. 124. (d) Albert DZ (May 1994) Scientific American, p. 58. (e)
Albert DZ (1992) Quantum mechanics and experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
(f) Bohm D, Hiley HB (1992) The undivided universe. Routledge, New York. (g) Baggott J
(1992) The meaning of quantum theory. Oxford University Press, New York. (h) Jammer M
(1974) The philosophy of quantum mechanics. Wiley, New York - Levine IN (2000) Quantum chemistry, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
- Sitzung der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, 14 December 1900, Verhandlung 2,
p. 237. This presentation and one of October leading up to it (Verhandlung 2, p. 202) were
combined in: Planck M (1901) Annal Phys 4(4):553 - Klein MJ (1966) Phys Today 19:23
- For a good and amusing account of quantum strangeness (and relativity effects) and how
things might be if Planck’s constant had a considerably different value, see Gamow G,
Stannard R (1999) The new world of Mr Tompkins. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
This is based on the classics by George Gamow, “Mr Tompkins in Wonderland” (1940) and
Mr Tompkins Explores the Atom” (1944), which were united in “Mr Tompkins in Paperback”
(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1965) - Einstein A (1905) Ann Phys 17:132. Actually, the measurements are very difficult to do
accurately, and the Einstein linear relationship may have been more a prediction than an
explanation of established facts - (a) For an elementary treatment of Maxwell’s equations and the loss of energy by an
accelerated electric charge, see Adair RK (1969) Concepts in physics. Academic, New
York, chapter 21. (b) For a brief historical introduction to Maxwell’s equations see Longair
MS (1983) Theoretical concepts in physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, chapter
3. For a rigorous treatment of the loss of energy by an accelerated electric charge see Longair,
chapter 9 - Bohr N (1913) Phil Mag 26:1
- Thornton ST, Rex A (1993) Modern physics for scientists and engineers. Saunders, Orlando,
FL, pp 155–164 - See Whitaker A (1996) Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, loc. cit - Schr€odinger E (1926) Ann Phys 79:361. This first Schr€odinger equation paper, a non-
relativistic treatment of the hydrogen atom, has been described as “one of the greatest
achievements of twentieth-century physics” (ref. [13], p. 205) - Moore W (1989) Schr€odinger. Life and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- de Broglie L (1924) Recherche sur la Theorie des Quanta. Thesis presented to the faculty of
sciences of the University of Paris - Moore W (1989) Schr€odinger. Life and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
Chapter 6 - Levine IN (2000) Quantum chemistry, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ,
pp 410–419, 604–613
168 4 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics in Computational Chemistry