Computational Chemistry

(Steven Felgate) #1

  1. Auer AA (2009) Chem Phys Lett 467:230

  2. Pe ́rez MP, Peakman TM, Alex A, Higginson PD, Mitchell JC, Snowden MJ, Inaki I (2006)
    J Org Chem 71:3103

  3. Wolf AD, Kane VV, Levin RH, Jones M (1973) J Am Chem Soc 95:1680

  4. (a) Schleyer PvR, Maerker C, Dransfeld A, Jiao H, Van Eikema Hommes NJR (1996) J Am
    Chem Soc 118:6317. (b) West R, Buffy J, Haaf M, M€uller T, Gehrhus B, Lappert MF,
    Apeloig Y (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:1639. (c) Chen Z, Wannere CS, Corminboef C,
    Puchta R, Schleyer PvR (2005) Chem Rev 105:3842. (d) Morao I, Cossio FP (1999) J Org
    Chem 64:1868

  5. Antusˇek A, Ke ̨dziera D, Jackowski K, Jaszun ́ski M, Makulski W (2008) Chem Phys 352:320

  6. Lowe JP (1993) Quantum chemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 276–277, 288,
    372–373

  7. Gross JH (2004) Mass spectrometry. Springer, New York, pp 16–20

  8. Levin RD, Lias SG (1982) Ionization potential and appearance potential measurements,
    1971–1981. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC

  9. (a) “How good is Koopmans’ approximation?”: Maksic ́ZB, Vianello R (2002) J Phys Chem
    A 106:6515. (b) See e.g. Lowe JP (1993) Quantum chemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press,
    New York, pp 361–363; Pilar FL (1990) Elementary quantum chemistry, 2nd edn. McGraw-
    Hill, New York, pp 278–280; Szabo A, Ostlund NS (1989) Modern quantum chemistry.
    McGraw-Hill, New York, pp.127–128; Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PvR, Pople JA (1986)
    Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, New York, pp 24, 116. (c) A novel look at
    Koopmans’ theorem: Angeli C (1998) J Chem Ed 75:1494. (d) Koopmans T (1934) Physica
    1:104

  10. Smith MB, March J (2001) March’s advanced organic chemistry, 5th edn. Wiley, New York,
    pp 10–12

  11. Curtiss LA, Nobes RH, Pople JA, Radom I (1992) J Chem Phys 97:6766

  12. Lyons JE, Rasmussen DR, McGrath MP, Nobes RH, Radom L (1994) Ang Chem Int Ed Engl
    33:1667

  13. (a) “...Chemistry, the most visual of sciences...”: Habraken CL (1996) J Sci Educ Phil 5:193.
    (b) Bower JE (ed) (1995) Data visualization in molecular science: tools for insight and
    innovation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. (c) Pickover C, Tewksbury S (1994) Frontiers
    of scientific visualization. Wiley, New York. (d) Johnson G (2001) Colors are truly brilliant
    in trek up mount metaphor, New York Times, 25 Dec 2001

  14. Ihlenfeldt W-D (1997) J Mol Model 3:386

  15. Hoffmann R, Laszlo P (1991) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 30:1

  16. GaussView: Gaussian Inc., Carnegie Office Park, Bldg. 6, Pittsburgh, PA 15106, USA

  17. Eliel EL, Wilen SH (1994) Stereochemistry of carbon compounds. Wiley, New York,
    pp 502–507 and 686–690

  18. Iijima T, Kondou T, Takenaka T (1998) J Mol Struct 445:23

  19. The term is not just whimsy on the author’s part: certain stereoelectronic phenomena arising
    from the presence of lone pairs on heteroatoms in a 1,3-relationship were once called the
    “rabbit-ear effect”, and a photograph of the eponymous creature even appeared on the cover
    of the Swedish journalKemisk Tidskrift. History of the term, photograph: Eliel EL (1990)
    From Cologne to Chapel Hill. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 62–64

  20. Politzer P, Murray JS (1996) In: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) Reviews in Computational
    Chemistry, vol 2, VCH, New York, chapter 7

  21. Hehre WJ, Shusterman AJ, Huang WW (1996) A laboratory book of computational organic
    chemistry. Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA, pp 141–142

  22. (a) Laube T (1989) J Am Chem Soc 111:9224. (b) Kirmse W, Rainer S, Streu J (1984) J Am
    Chem Soc 106:24654. (c) Houriet R, Schwarz H, Zummack W, Andrade JG, Schleyer PvR
    (1981) Nouveau J Chim 5:505. (d) Olah GA, Prakash GKS, Rawdah TN, Whittaker D, Rees
    JC (1979) J Am Chem Soc 101:3935. (e) A polemic against the formation of a bishomocy-
    clopropenyl cation is a certain case: Sorenson TS (1976) Chem Commun 45


References 387

Free download pdf