Computational Chemistry

(Steven Felgate) #1

References



  1. Lykos P (1997) Chapter 2 “The evolution of computers in chemistry. In: Zielinski TJ, Swift ML
    (eds) Using computers in chemistry and chemical education. American Chemical Society,
    Washington DC

  2. (a) Westheimer FH, Mayer JE (1946) J Chem Phys 14:733. (b) Hill TL (1946) J Chem Phys
    14:465. (c) Westheimer FH (1947) J Chem Phys 15:252. (d) Dostrovsky I, Hughes ED, Ingold
    CK (1946) J Chem Soc 173

  3. H€uckel E (1931) Z Physik 70:204, and subsequent papers (see H€uckel E (1975) Ein Gelehr-
    tenleben. Ernst und Satire. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 178–179)

  4. E.g. (a) The pioneering popularization: Roberts JD (1962) Notes on molecular orbital
    calculations. Benjamin, New York. (b) A detailed treatment: Streitweiser A (1961) Molecu-
    lar orbital theory for organic chemists. Wiley, New York. (c) Perhaps the definitive presen-
    tation of the simple H€uckel method is Heilbronner E, Bock H (1968) Das HMO Modell und
    seine Anwendung. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany, vol. 1 (basics and implemen-
    tation); (1970) vol. 2, (examples and solutions); (1970) vol. 3 (tables of experimental
    and calculated quantities). An English translation of vol. 1 is available: English edition:
    Heilbronner E, Bock H (1976) The HMO model and its application. Basics and manipula-
    tion. Verlag Chemie

  5. Wheeler LP (1951) Josiah Willard Gibbs. The history of a great mind. Yale University Press,
    New Haven, Ct

  6. Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) vols 1–18; Lipkowitz
    KB, Larter R, Cundari TR (eds) vols 19–21; Lipkowitz, KB, Cundari TR, Gillet VJ (eds)
    vol 22; Lipkowitz KB, Cundari TR (eds) vols 23–26. VCH, New York. http://chem.iupui.edu/
    rcc/rcc.html.


Chapter 1, Harder Questions, Answers


Q2


Can “conventional” physical chemistry, such as the study of kinetics, thermody-
namics, spectroscopy and electrochemistry, be regarded as a kind of computational
chemistry?
First, let’s realize that the boundaries between the old divisions of chemistry –
organic, inorganic, physical, theoretical – are no longer sharp: all chemists should
have a fair amount of theory, and with the help of this a chemist from one of the four
divisions (one hesitates to stress the term division) should not be a complete
outsider in any of the other three. That said, whether someone working in one of
the “conventional” fields is doing computational chemistry depends: the term could
be taken to mean calculation used to anticipate or rationalize experimental results,
to predict unrealized chemistry, or to explain (usually puzzling) experimental
results. So a kineticist might use computations to predict or explain rate constants,
or an organic chemist might use computations to predict or explain the properties of
novel organic compounds.


586 Answers

Free download pdf