124
by it on several sides without actually belonging to it. The
relationship between spaces that are folded into one another
in this way amounts to a com-pli-cated (French: le pli, fold)
form of > screening. Multiple folds form > space-containing
walls. With vertical spatial transitions, floors or levels can be
folded in such a way that in place of separate horizontal lev-
els, we find flowing transitions between them, as discrete divi-
sions between floors are abandoned in favour of continuous
movement, an example being the design of a library for the
University of Paris at Jussieu by OMA.
Folding is a procedure through which forms respond to
one another flexibly, flow into one another, or in general al-
low room for manoeuvre between them and in relationship
to their contents. In architecture, in ways that are analogous
to the way folds in garments yield to allow space to form
between clothing and body, a building may accommodate
challenging physical or programmatic framing conditions by
displaying the flexibility of folds in the figurative sense, may
‘bend instead of breaking’ (Lynn).
Literature: Lynn 1993
According to Rudolf Arnheim, even when an architectural
space is not seen, it is nonetheless perceived through the ‘Intu-
itive force’, and depends upon it (1977/2009). The dynamics
of such powers of intuition are characterized by Arnheim as
an essential component of every perceptual act that goes be-
yond mere sensory stimulation: ‘The play of forces is the ob-
ject of perception.’ Space is not empty; instead, we perceive the
forces between the forms as influencing the space between
walls and architectural elements, as well as our own stand-
point.
Arnheim describes the impact of such forces in detail:
already the spatial relationships between an object towards
which one moves and one’s own position is imagined as a
linear connection, one that is set off from its surroundings.
Force field