Fundamental Concepts of Architecture : The Vocabulary of Spatial Situations

(avery) #1

294


The space-body continuum can be illustrated in relation
to the dual role of the surface (1), through the reversal of fig-
ure ground relationships (2), and through the transition from
one scale to another (3).


  1. The > surface plays a decisive role, since a (concave)
    interior side can become a (convex) exterior side, and vice
    versa. The concave inner side of a room, for example, often
    displays convex areas, which protrude out into the space,
    i.e. projections or columns; concave areas, in turn, may ap-
    pear on the exterior of an architectural body, i.e. recesses or
    niches, which contain external space. Even when a building,
    in conjunction with others, forms the concave contour of the
    contained outdoor space of a > courtyard or > square, there
    is an interplay of concave and convex forms whose mediating
    element is the surface, which is shared by both architectural
    mass and spatial figure, and which forms the outer limit of
    the of one and the inner side of the other. In a kind of ‘con-
    tour rivalry’, both lay claim to the surface of this common
    boundary, which can be perceived as continuous, although
    the balance between concave and convex may be reverse quite
    abruptly, for example when one moves around the ‘body of
    the building’, which in turn delimits a public square with its
    wall.
    The dominant figural quality is assigned either to a body
    or to a spatial form. If the body/mass figure dominates, the
    Prägnanz of the surrounding spatial gestalt is reduced; one
    can tell from the outside of a body/mass when it contains an
    incisive, inner spatial gestalt. If the body/mass figure, however,
    is reduced to its role as a spatial contour, the body/mass ge-
    stalt is deprived of Prägnanz, and the body at most contains
    subordinate spatial units in the form of a > poché. One can
    readily imagine architectural forms that are ambivalent or
    remain indecisive in this respect, which are both body/mass
    figures and spatial contours, or neither (chora), for example
    the L-shaped forms from which Peter Eisenman (1989) as-
    sembled his Guardiola House: ‘It breaks the notion of figure/

Free download pdf