75
The spatial context of the landscape is interwoven with
the building, i.e. when both belong to the same order, or are
interlocked with one another as complementary figures, for
example when the outer containing walls are configured in
such a way that they frame the exterior space. But as a con-
text, the landscape complements a building primarily by ex-
tending the space in relation to its interior, opening up ex-
panded vistas, while delimiting this broader space.
Every reference to context presupposes a specific inter-
pretation; based on it is either the differentiated confrontation
with the context, or its deliberate neglect, i.e. where the focus of
attention is entirely on a free-standing and sculptural architec-
tural form. The demonstrative non-response to context on the
part of megastructures has been characterized by Rem Kool-
haas with the words: ‘Bigness is no longer part of any urban
tissue. (...) Its subtext is fuck context.’ (Koolhaas/Mau 1995,
502) Yet such an attitude itself represents a communicative
response to context, one that in turn itself generates context.
Literature: Van Eyck 1960/2003; Kemp 2009; Rowe/Koetter
1978; Schumacher 1926
> flowing space, space, space-body continuum
> body (architectural), concavity and convexity, form char-
acter
> angle and corner
> access, courtyard, gallery, route
> comfortableness, dwelling, warmth and cold, residence
An interior courtyard is the space within a building that is
set beneath the open sky. There, one is outdoors, and can
engage in certain activities out in the open without actually
leaving the house. In the form of a kind of spatial > inver-
sion, the courtyard can be conceived as an exterior space
that is everted so that it occupies a building’s interior. In his
Continuous space
Convexity
Corner
Corridor
Cosiness
Courtyard