Microsoft Word - 00_Title_draft.doc

(Chris Devlin) #1
Annex 1. Numerical fiscal ru

les considered in the study

COUNTRY

TYPE OF RULE

DEFINITION OF THE RULE (AGREGATE TARGETED

& RELEVANT

ACCOUNTING SYSTEM

)

SECTOR

(S) COVERED

TIME FRAME

STATUTORY BASE

BODY IN CHARGE OF MONITORING

ENFORCEMENT

(BODY

& ACTIONS

IN CASE OF NON


  • COMPLIANCE


)

AUSTRIA

Budget balance rule

Budget balance as a % of GDP ESA95 accounting

Central, regional and local governments

Multiannual (4 years)

Legal act (based on Constitution)

Governmental structure (Committee with central, regional and local government representatives)

Governmental structure Possibility of sanctions

BELGIUM

Expenditure rule (in the convergence process leading to EMU qualification)

Real expenditure growth rate Budgetary accounting

Central government

Multiannual (4 years)

Coalition agreement

Independent (Court of Auditors and the High Council of Fina

nce) and National

Parliament.

Governmental structure No pre-defined action

Revenue rule (in the convergence process leading to EMU qualification)

Nominal growth of fiscal revenues in relation to nominal GDP growth Budgetary accounting

Central government

Multiannual (4 years)

Coalition agreement

No body

Government (Ministry of Finance) No pre-defined action

Expenditure rule

Real expenditure growth rate Budgetary accounting (consistent with ESA95)

Social security

Multiannual (4 years)

Legal act

Independent (Court of Auditors and Wise Men Committee) and National Parliament

Government (Ministry of Health), possibly social partners Automatic mechanism if sanction

Budget balance rule

Budget balance in nominal terms Budgetary accounting

Social security

Multiannual (4 years)

Coalition agreement

Governmental structure (Ministries of Budget and Social Affairs)

Governmental structure (Ministries of Budget and Social Affairs) No pre-defined action

Budget balance rule

Real expenditure growth rate ESA95 accounting

Regional government

Multiannual (5 years)

Political agreement between central and regional governments i

Independent (High Council of Finance)

Governmental structure Possibility of sanctions

Budget balance rule

Budget balance in nominal terms Budgetary accounting

Local government

Annual

Legal act

Independent (High Council of Finance) and regional Government

Governmental structure (regional government) corrects possible slippages by taking appropriate actions

CZECH REPUBLIC

Expenditure rule

Nominal expenditure ceiling Budgetary accounting

Central government

Multiannual (3 years)

Political agreement (medium-term expenditure framework enshrined in legal act

Government (Ministry of Finance)

None No pre-defined action; government provides explanations in case of non-compliance

Debt rule

Limit on debt service Budgetary accounting

Regional and local governments

Annual

Political agreement

Government (Ministry of Finance)

Government Corrective measures are proposed - possibility of sanctions

DENMARK

Expenditure rule

Real expenditure growth rate ESA95 accounting

General government

Multiannual

Political agreement

Government (Ministry of Finance)

Government (Ministry of Finance) No pre-defined action

Revenue rule

Limits on direct or indirect tax rates (tax freeze)

General government

n.a.

Political agreement

Government (Ministry of Finance)

Government (Ministry of Finance) No pre-defined action

Budget balance rule

Target as a % of GDP in structural terms ESA95 accounting

General government

Multiannual (up to 2010)

Political agreement

Government (Ministry of Finance)

Government (Ministry of Finance) No pre-defined action

ESTONIA

Budget balance rule

Budget balance in nominal terms Budgetary accounting

General government

Multiannual

Coalition agreement

Government (Ministry of Finance)

Government and national Parliament No pre-defined action; possibility of cuts in expenditure if revenue shortfall
Free download pdf