Robinson, M. and J. Brumby (2005), “Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Analytical Review of the
Empirical Literature”, Working Paper WP05/210, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.
Rubin, I. and J. Kelly (2005), “Budget and Accounting Reforms” in E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, Jr. and
C. Pollitt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, pp. 590-639, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ruggiero, J. and W. Duncombe (1995), “On the Measurement and Causes of Technical Inefficiency in
Local Public Services”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(4), pp. 403-429.
Savas, E.S. (2000), Privatization and Public Private Partnerships, Chatham House Publishers, London.
Scheers, B., M. Sterck and G. Bouckaert (2005), “Lessons from Australian and British Reforms in
Results-oriented Financial Management”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(2), pp. 133-162.
Scherer, F.M. and D. Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Third
edition, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Schick, A. (1996), The Spirit of Reform: Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change
(A Report Prepared for the State Services Commission and the Treasury, New Zealand), State
Services Commission, Wellington, http://www.ssc.govt.nz.
Schick, A. (2001), “The Changing Role of the Central Budget Office”, OECD Journal on Budgeting,
1(1), pp. 9-26.
Schick, A. (2003), “The Performing State: Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has Come but Whose
Implementation Has Not”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(2), pp. 71-103.
Selden, S. (1997), The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a
Government Agency, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York, United States.
Selden, S.C., P.W. Ingraham and W. Jacobson (2001), “Human Resource Practices in State Government:
Findings from a National Survey”, Public Administration Review, 61(5).
Shepard, L.A. (1990), “Inflated Test Score Gains: Is the Problem Old Norms or Teaching the Test”,
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 9, pp. 15-22.
Smith, M.L. and C. Rottenberg (1991), “Unintended Consequences of External Testing in Elementary
Schools”, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), pp. 7-11.
Smith, P. (1995), “On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public
Sector”, International Journal of Public Administration, 18, pp. 277-310.
Social and Cultural Planning Office (2004), Public Sector Performance. An international comparison,
SCP, The Hague, http://www.scp.nl.
Steinmann, L. and P. Zweifel (2003), “On the (in)efficiency of Swiss hospitals”, Applied Economics, 35,
pp. 361-370.
Sterck, M. and B. Scheers (2006), “Trends in Performance Budgeting in Seven OECD Countries”, Public
Performance and Management Review, 30(1), September, pp. 47-72.
Swedish Ministry of Finance (1996), Productivity Trends in the Public Sector in Sweden, Ministry of
Finance, Stockholm.
United Kingdom House of Commons, Public Administration Select Committee (2003), On Target?
Government by Measurement (Fifth report of Session 2002-03; Volume 1), The Stationery Office Ltd,
London, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmpubadm/62/62.pdf.
Verhoest, Koen (2002), Resultaatgericht verzelfstandigen. Een analyse vanuit een verruimd principaal-
agent perspectief, Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven,
Belgium, http://www.kuleuven.ac.be.
Verhoest, Koen (2005), “Effects of Autonomy, Performance Contracting and Competition on the
Performance of a Public Agency”, Policy Studies Journal, 33(2).
Verhoest, Koen and Geert Bouckaert (2003), “Machinery of Government: Shifting from Effectiveness of
Coordination to Coordination of Effectiveness”, paper presented at the international workshop on