and various embouchures and strengths of blowing.With the full notes
in the center,we indicated our assessment of the tone that sounds most
often and most readily with a specific combination.Deviation from the
cited (assessed) tone could be considerable in individual cases,but lies
somewhere within the marked range.(A table of tones of the flute from
plaster is not given since results were fairly similar to those with metal
flutes.)
All the flutes in figures 15.12,15.13,and 15.14 were treated as notched
flutes.They have the same length,very similar shape,and almost the same
mouthpiece (see figure 15.6).A comparison and analysis of the results
in the different tables is very interesting.We were above all surprised
that we could produce a fairly wide range of tones with all reconstruc-
tions.So,within specific ranges of frequency,we could produce individ-
ual popular tunes (and thus scales).This fact does not make the task of
seeking possible original scales any easier;in fact it blurs it and makes it
much more difficult (see B.Fink in Anonymous 1997).If we attempt
an uncritical generalization of the results and take into consideration
only individual assessments of the most frequent tones with each
261 New Perspectives on the Beginnings of Music
Figure 15.13
Tones obtained from a reconstruction of the bone flute from fresh bear bone with various
combinations of closed and open holes.The flute was played as a notched flute.
Fig.15.13