switches to a grunt,will the listener’s interest be revived? If interest is
revived,is this due to an acoustic or semantic difference?
Figure 6.3 provides a schematic illustration of the experimental design.
Test subjects participated in either a within-referent session (habituate
to warble and test with harmonic arch,or the reverse) or a between-
referent session (habituate to warble or harmonic arch and test with
grunt,or the reverse);the identity of the caller was held constant
throughout a session.Different exemplars of one call type were played
until the subject failed to look in the direction of the speaker on two con-
secutive trials.Having habituated,we played back one exemplar from a
different call type category.If the subject responded (interest revived,
subject orients),we ended the session.If the subject failed to respond
(transferred habituation),we ran a posttest trial using an exemplar from
a different call type category.The reason for the posttest trial was to
85 Primate Vocalizations in Emotion and Thought
Figure 6.3
Experimental design for habituation-discrimination playback with rhesus monkey food-
associated calls.In the upper panel,a hypothetical within-referent condition is shown,with
habituation to warbles and then test with harmonic arch.The posttest trial involves a single
playback of a shrill bark.The lower panel shows a hypothetical between-referent condi-
tion,with habituation to grunts and test with a harmonic arch or warble.
Fig.6.3