Planning Capital Cities

(Barré) #1
Bucharest’s urban planning instruments during the communist regime:
systematization sketches, plans, projects and interventions

In 1921 the first proper urban systematization plan for Bucharest was issued
by royal decree. It represented a complex work, strategically imagined for the
next 50 years. The plan proposed urban zoning, a unified and hierarchical view
of the street network, building and parceling regulations, provisions regarding
monuments, etc.

It is important to note that the complexity of a systematization plan was very
well understood and established by the 1938 Instructions and provisions for
the elaboration of systematization plans, which imposes three stages of such a
project: the sketch (containing the principles), the directive plan (more detailed,
it offers solutions) and the alignment systematization plans (very detailed, with
alignments for buildings and streets). The project also comprised of written
regulations and an administrative implementation project.^5

One of the principles that would have an impact
on future developments is the determination of a
minimum and a maximum height for the buildings
on boulevards and housing areas. Bucharest started
out as a very spread and low city and it was believed
that its urban aspect (and in the end it economic
and functional aspects, as well) depended on higher
buildings, at least on the main boulevards. So the
height was established at minimum 8m, with a
maximum dictated by the width of the adjacent
street (resulting around 18m) and with possibilities
for higher buildings with recessed upper floors. A
certain flexibility of the regulation led to heterogenic
developments regarding height.

In 1935 a new Plan Director de Sistematizare
al Municipiului Bucureşti (Directive Urban
Development Plan for Bucharest) was drafted and
its adjacent regulations were approved by 1939.
The plan stipulates the paramount importance of
housing areas for the future development of the
city and, by an import from the German legislation,
it proposes building classes. These were defined
by: “the minimum surface, minimum façade length
and depth of the plot, building density, building
grouping, overall dimension, direct perspectives”^6.
The admitted height for buildings grew again, to
24 m. The hierarchical structure of circulation was
a continuous preoccupation, especially when it
comes to the representative urban spaces of the
boulevards.

Fig. 1
The 1935 Directive Urban Development Plan. Published in
Urbanismul, 4/2010.

Free download pdf