project as a priority.^72 By noting that this project
couldn’t be financed only by public funds and loans,
which was considered as the main obstacle for the
earliar unrealised visions, the actual Prime Minister
Aleksandar Vucic has directed all his efforts to find a
potential investor for the project.
After a series of urban concepts that were appearing
in the media during 2013, a Belgrade Waterfront
Master Plan was presented in Dubai in March 2014
by Mohamed Alabbar, the director of the newly
established company and potential investor “Eagle
Hills”.^73 The master plan was presented to the
domestic public at the renovated building of the
Institute of Geophysics, known as “Geozavod”, which
become the showroom of the project in June 2014.
The project web page announced that Belgrade
Waterfront would take the urban renewal to new
heights - a future smart city that combines commerce,
culture and community.^74 The master plan envisions
the construction of offices and luxury apartment
buildings, eight hotels, a shopping mall and a 200m
high tower as the main symbol of the area and of
Belgrade as well. The investor’s view is a truly mixed-
use environment that will usher in a new era of
prosperity the Serbian capital.^75
Seen as an initiative that will create jobs and growth and turn Belgrade into a
business hub for the Western Balkans^76 the project was given by the government
the status of one of national importance, which allowed the acceleration of
the process of defining the framework for its implementation. In a period of
several months the Spatial Plan for Belgrade 2021 has been changed and the
Spatial Plan for the Development of the coastal area of Belgrade’s riverside was
adopted for the Belgrade Waterfront project.
Since these processes have been a novelty in the urban development practice
in Serbia, the project encountered a sharp criticism by both the professionals
and the public. The citizens gathered using the legitime tools around the
initiative “Ne da(vi)mo Beograd!”.^77 They organized a series of activities and
performances to point out the future consequences of the practices known as
“investor’s urbanism”, as well as to prevent the modification and adoption of
the existing plans. They criticized the abolition of the public evaluation of the
site conducted in the form of competition, the unknown authorship behind the
proposed solution and the inexistence of a precise economic framework that
determines the price of enterprise and provides its benefits. The professional
Belgrade: The quest for the desired city image
Fig. 17
The renewed outlook of the “Geozavod” building; the Belgrade
Waterfront Gallery. (Belgrade Waterfront)