26 The Sunday Times February 13, 2022
COMMENT
Andrew became the 11th housing
minister since 2010: hardly a sign that
this is a priority.
The Conservative Party keeps telling
itself a familiar lie, which is that you can
build all the necessary homes where
voters won’t notice them. In his latest
party conference speech Johnson
argued that there was plenty of room to
build — “not on green fields, not just
jammed in the southeast but beautiful
homes on brownfield sites in places
where homes make sense”.
This is not just wrong, but
dangerously wrong. Yes, we should
build on brownfield. No, there isn’t
remotely enough of it. And even if
levelling up is a triumphant success,
you cannot fix years of undersupply in
the south by building in the north, in
the hope that economic activity will
follow. “Places where homes make
sense” tends to mean “places where
voters don’t want them”.
This is why many in the industry are
nervous about the planning rules being
drawn up by Michael Gove. The
levelling-up white paper suggests that
the government sees extra building in
deprived areas as the way to relieve
pressure in the southeast: the exact
opposite of supply and demand. The
scuttlebutt in the housing industry is
that Gove will not only water down
D
uring the first year of the
pandemic something weird
happened. The economy was
cratering. Yet Britain’s
households found themselves
almost £900 billion richer.
Partly that was driven by a
surge in stock markets. But for
most people that extra wealth came
from the soaring value of their home,
which sometimes seemed to be the only
thing growing more quickly than
infection rates.
The result, as we report today, is that
the number of £1 million properties
outside London has sky-rocketed. But in
the process the already cavernous gap
between have-homes and have-nots has
grown even wider. Last year the cost of a
deposit jumped from 102 per cent of
average income to a record 110 per cent.
In London it would take the average
worker more than 15 years to save for a
deposit. And a combination of
pandemic-driven relocation and the
cladding crisis has reduced the number
of properties on the market to an all-
time low — so prices are likely to go
higher still.
This is only the latest chapter in a
slow-motion tragedy. Being able to own
your own home is the essence of the
good life. In a country with a functioning
housing market it should happen almost
by default. But we are woefully,
humiliatingly far from that point. As
recently as 1991, 78 per cent of those
aged 35-44 were owner-occupiers.
Today, the figure is 56 per cent. Among
those aged 25-34, it’s dropped from
67 per cent to 41 per cent.
This crisis is not just poisoning the
dreams of a generation. It has all manner
of toxic side effects. A recent essay on
the Works in Progress website pointed to
a laundry list of problems that are being
exacerbated by housing shortages,
including inequality, wage growth,
innovation, productivity, fertility rates
and obesity.
What is so irritating for those of us
banging our heads against this brick wall
(or, rather, wishing there were more
brick walls to bang our heads against) is
that the problem is easily soluble. Britain
is not cramped or overcrowded, not
even remotely. In England homes take
up just 1.1 per cent of the land, and
gardens a few per cent more. Our cities
are scandalously low rise. A majority of
voters would welcome a large increase in
housebuilding, even in their local area.
But time and again politicians shy
away from the fence. Faced with a
parliamentary mutiny, Boris Johnson
not only ripped up his planning reforms
but fired the minister responsible,
Robert Jenrick. Last week Stuart
to misguided regulation and a wave of
cheap money. In the decade after the
financial crisis they snapped up two
million extra properties — a lot more
than we actually built.
Johnson has championed a solution
proposed by my think tank, the Centre
for Policy Studies: long-term, fixed-rate,
low-deposit mortgages. But the Bank of
England refuses to budge.
Likewise our suggestion of bribing
landlords to sell to tenants was seen as
heretical by the Treasury. And in the
social housing sector councils and
housing associations have successfully
strangled the right to buy.
The collapse of home ownership isn’t
just scarring our society. As I’ve said
before, it represents an existential threat
to the Conservative Party.
If you don’t create new homes, you
don’t create new Tories. Indeed, the
most electorally successful governments
don’t just win elections: they create
more of their own voters.
A Tory party that remains in thrall to
the nimbys is one that doesn’t expand its
voting base but actively constricts it.
Telling northern voters to get on their
bike and look for work didn’t go down
well in the 1980s. Telling southern voters
to get in their cars and look for homes
will go down even worse.
@RColvile
buyers driven by its support schemes.
But new houses are still well short of the
300,000-a-year target, and the surge
relied on pushing 400,000 planning
permissions a year through the system.
Many councils have been sitting on their
hands in the hope that Gove will lower
their quotas. Meanwhile, activity stalls.
The failure to build isn’t just
hammering home ownership. It’s
damaging growth. Last week a group
of big investors wrote to Rishi Sunak
asking for reassurances about the future
of the Oxford-Cambridge arc, intended
to be a major development area. They
pointed out that Oxford and Cambridge
are adding just 300,000 square feet a
year of laboratory space for pharma
research, while the university towns’
American rival Boston has almost six
million square feet under construction.
The investors believe that local
councils’ reluctance to approve
development is a direct threat to the
UK’s ambitions to be a scientific
superpower — and to our future
prosperity. Companies will not choose
the UK if they cannot build facilities and
their staff cannot afford homes.
Home ownership is not just driven by
housebuilding. One of our biggest
problems is that buy-to-let landlords
have found it much easier to get
mortgages than first-time buyers, thanks
This crisis is not
just poisoning
the dreams of a
generation. It has
toxic side effects
Robert Colvile
Stuff the nimbys and build, build, build — the
future of Britain (and the Tories) depends on it
Jenrick’s proposals but slash housing
targets for the south by a third or more.
Those around Gove reject this
analysis. They insist that he remains
committed to housebuilding. His
strategy, they say, is to incentivise
communities to want housing rather
than oppose it. The favoured acronym is
Biden: beautiful homes, with
appropriate infrastructure, under
democratic control, which enhance the
environment and are approved by the
neighbourhood. But to get houses built
you need sticks as well as carrots. The
government points to recent increases in
housebuilding and a surge in first-time
their medieval ways and
hatred of women?
The situation in the country
is a disaster, but it was created
by the Taliban and it is within
their power to correct. They
must show their willingness
to change. I would happily
give as much government aid
as they need, but it must be
on our terms, not theirs.
Julie Parkinson
Haltwhistle, Northumberland
The pandemic has widened the education attainment gap
ALAMY
A life in the
Magazine
It was fascinating to trace my
life through your review of 60
years of The Sunday Times
Magazine (last week), but one
aspect of the supplement not
mentioned was the impact on
us paper-deliverers of the
time. In 12 months our bags
doubled in weight, as other
papers raced to bring out
their own versions. I can still
smell the mixture of wet
canvas and ink, and feel the
pull on my right shoulder.
Derek Kennard, Grimsby
Colours supplement
The review was a happy
reminder of the great help the
Magazine gave me in the
1960s. As signal officer of HM
Yacht Britannia, I had to
ensure that we were carrying
all the necessary standards
and flags when on royal duty.
Early in 1964 we were in
the Caribbean when
numerous colonies were
LETTERS
TO THE EDITOR
The Sunday Times,
1 London Bridge Street,
London SE1 9GF
Email: letters@
sunday-times.co.uk
JOIN THE CONVERSATION ONLINE
brave and resourceful: Jane
Eyre, The Secret Garden and, a
more adult version,
Fingersmith. I don’t get the
fashion for drippy heroines
with alcohol problems and an
unwillingness to rid
themselves of toxic
boyfriends. I read more non-
fiction these days — Diana
Athill is wonderful, as is
Nora Ephron.” Mrs
Chinnery found escape in
books too: “I would
recommend Moon Tiger by
Penelope Lively, and perhaps
even Journey by Moonlight by
Antal Szerb. They do ‘looking
back’ so beautifully.” Helen
Eccles also liked Ephron on
ageing, especially I Feel Bad
about My Neck: And Other
Thoughts on Being a Woman,
“a book that offers something
new on each reading”. Hilary
Lester “first read
Middlemarch at the age of 17.
I’m now 70 and it has been
the answer to all life’s
questions.”
Morten Morland draws as
many appreciative comments
as the columns around his
cartoons. Michael Lumb
loved his latest peek inside
No 10, espying a PM “looking
through Jimmy Carr scripts
for a killer putdown to use at
PMQs”. Richard Carter saw
“Larry and Dilyn composing
their letters to Sir Graham
Brady”. Keith6646
observed: “The front door is
open, ready for a swift exit.”
“BorExit?” — a flash of wit
from Don Giovanni. Hmph.
Wish we’d thought of that.
Rob Nash
Your comments from
thesundaytimes.co.uk
“Bibliotherapy — a wonderful
idea!” That was Another
Voice’s apposite description
of Mariella Frostrup’s new
Magazine column. “Many
years ago,” AV continued,
“during counselling for
depression, the therapist
discovered my love of John
Fowles, so we used The
French Lieutenant’s Woman,
with its different endings, to
explore my inability to make
big decisions. I ended up
becoming a psychologist —
he’d laugh if he knew.” Susan
Baxendale loved the idea
too: “I was orphaned young
and had a difficult childhood,
so I relate to having an
alternative life in my head
through books. I loved ones
in which the heroine looked
adversity in the eye and was
Last week we asked:
Has Boris Johnson been a good prime minister?
From a poll of 47, 177 Times and Sunday Times readers
This week’s question:
Is there too much sex on TV?
Have your say at sundaytimes.co.uk/poll
NO
12% 88%
YES
READERS’ POLL
Playing to the gallery
Perhaps your article “Tate
ditches Sackler name” (News,
last week) was limited by
space. It explained that Tate
was removing the Sackler
name because of the family’s
role in the opioid crisis — but
it seemed to be missing the
line that said it was going to
give the money back too.
Valerie Humphrey
London SE1
Valentine’s day off
The “bizarre new parenting
fad” of Valentine’s gifts for
children (News, last week)
isn’t new at all. A century or
so ago in Norfolk (yes, I
know), it was mainly for the
children: there was a day off
school, tricks and presents
and children would sing the
Valentine Carol for pennies.
Even in the 1950s my
Norwich friends and I were
still given tins of sweets on
February 14.
Antoinette Faulkner, Norwich
Cat’s got my tongue
My cat has instructed me to
reply to Paul Phillips, who
says a cat is a lazy person’s
dog (Letters, last week). We
would like to point out that a
dog is a needy person’s cat.
Kay Bagon (pp Tosca)
Radlett, Hertfordshire
Letters from America
At the risk of sounding as if I
am one-upping, my family
were playing Wordle’s
precursor, Jotto, in the 1950s
(Letters, last week). My
parents brought this game
back from the States, and I
still have the printed pads to
prove it.
Anne Leach
Northwood, London
Asleep on the job
We spend millions on hotel
accommodation for refugees.
You report that we have also
spent £530 million on
Nightingale hospitals with the
wrong type of bed (News, last
week). Could we not provide
this accommodation to the
needy? Or would the cost of
asking our civil servants to
manage this be prohibitive?
Martin Patey, Redhill, Surrey
Heroic handshake
Camilla Long writes
dismissively of a generation
“who thought it was all right
simply to shake hands with
their offspring” (Comment,
last week). My father was a
policeman in London during
the Blitz. He survived its
horrors under a carapace
where self-pity had no place.
When I went away to school
aged eight, he patted me on
the head and said he would
not kiss me any more. It did
not stop me showing overt
affection to my own children,
and some might say that my
father’s sort of Britishness is
much missed.
Tim Blenkin, York
1991 US bombs kill at least
408 civilians near Baghdad
2017 Kim Jong-un’s brother
Jong-nam assassinated at
Kuala Lumpur airport
Robbie Williams is 48 today
CORRECTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS
ANNIVERSARIES
BIRTHDAYS POINTS
becoming independent and
designing their own national
flags. This included Trinidad
and Jamaica, for which the
admiralty had not yet issued
the specifications; however,
the Magazine (of which we
had a copy) did show them.
With that, our good stock
of bunting and the skills of
our yeoman of signals, Gerry
King, we were able to enter
ports displaying the proper
flags on our mizzen mast.
Captain Nick Kettlewell
Sherborne, Dorset
Dame Vera Baird, victims’
commissioner, 72
Joyce DiDonato, singer, 53
Peter Gabriel, musician, 72
Kim Novak, actress, 89
Rachel Reeves, shadow
chancellor, 43
Prof Sir Simon Schama,
historian, 77
Robbie Williams, singer, 48
It was mad to make
a party animal PM
Max Hastings asks, with
reference to Boris Johnson,
“What was any sane person
thinking, to suppose him an
appropriate person to be our
national leader?” (News, last
week). The answer may be
that we want fallible nitwits
like ourselves in power, so
those who are adulterers,
jokers and incompetents are
at no disadvantage.
Of course, Hastings is right:
granting supreme executive
authority on the basis of who
you would like to chat to at a
disreputable but enjoyable
party is never a good idea.
Stephen Chappell
Upper Colwall, Herefordshire
Leave off
Hastings asks: “What was any
sane person thinking” when
electing Johnson? In the 2019
leadership election I thought
I was choosing not a national
moral exemplar (a role filled
admirably by the Queen) but
an effective politician. I
wanted a PM for whom Brexit
was an opportunity, not a
damage-limitation exercise. I
got what I voted for.
Hastings is entitled to
disagree with the majority of
Conservative Party members,
and with the electorate that
subsequently validated our
choice, but not to question
our sanity.
Colin Podmore, London SE18
Bad beginning
Hastings’s excellent article
reminded me of how Johnson
misled the Queen in advising
her to suspend parliament in
- From the start of his
leadership the writing was on
the wall. What has happened
since should come as no
surprise.
Chris Hall, Solihull
Who’s in charge?
I find the standards applied to
“Partygate” and the failure to
prosecute Jimmy Savile
confusing.
According to one’s political
persuasion, it seems there is a
difference between the
leader of one large
organisation not knowing
what the staff are doing, and
the leader of another large
organisation not knowing
what the staff are doing.
David Glyn James
Caldy, Wirral
Tank toppling
You report the prime
minister telling his allies that
“they’ll have to send a Panzer
division to get him out” of
Downing Street (News, last
week). Is this why the foreign
secretary was photographed
honing her tank-driving skills
in Estonia in November?
Philippa Wilks
Millhayes, Devon
May I point out ...
Theresa May is displeased
with Johnson’s leadership
(“Revenge of the Maybot”,
News, last week). But it was
she who promoted him to
foreign secretary, knowing
well his hedonistic character.
So who is to blame for this
disaster of a PM?
Tod O’Brien, York
Two of a kind
Johnson’s supporters accuse
Rishi Sunak of “blatantly
plotting” and say that no one
will “ever elect someone so
duplicitous as leader”. Surely
this raises the question: just
how did Johnson become
leader?
Alistair Nicoll, Sheffield
Eton mess
Based upon the performance
of a recent and the present
prime minister, could the
rules for election of future
leaders be amended to
preclude candidates who
attended Eton?
It might save us a lot of
trouble in future.
David Barnett
Tring, Hertfordshire
Readers’ poleaxe
I was interested by your
readers’ poll. If 88 per cent of
Sunday Times readers, whom
I regard as reasonably
sensible and intelligent,
decree that Johnson has been
a bad PM, then it is clearly
time for him to go.
Dr Jim Hay
Menstrie, Clackmannanshire
Old and wealthy?
Pay more tax
How good to read a letter
from a group of millionaires
urging the chancellor to raise
their taxes (Letters, last
week). They are not the only
ones who have got richer
during the pandemic. I am a
75-year-old pensioner who
agrees that those who can
afford it should pay more tax
— rather than, for instance,
receive an extra £350 winter
fuel payment. Older, wealthier
taxpayers should take more
of the fiscal burden that is
falling on the less fortunate.
Tricia Lawrence
Malmesbury, Wiltshire
Donations welcome
Every citizen is free to make
voluntary contributions to
HMRC. I encourage these
“patriotic millionaires” to
lead the way by doing so.
That would be the genuinely
patriotic thing to do.
Andrew Wauchope
London SE11
Market rules
If a self-appointed group of
virtue-signalling millionaires
wish to voluntarily pay more
tax, that is their choice. But
they have no right to demand
increased capital taxes on
everyone else.
David Miller, Chigwell, Essex
We said a Focaldata poll
showed Rishi Sunak had the
best chance of reaching
voters in red wall seats (News,
last week). We have since
been made aware that, while
the poll showed a lead for
Sunak when first and second
preferences for prime
minister were combined, it
showed him behind Boris
Johnson on first preferences
alone. We are happy to make
this clear.
The shipping line MSC has the
capacity to move 4.3 million
20ft containers, not
4.3 billion as we wrongly
stated (Business, last week).
A caption indicated that a
photo showed workers
enjoying a lunchtime drink at
Leadenhall Market, in the
City of London (Business, last
week). In fact the photo was
taken after working hours.
We apologise for the error.
Complaints concerning
inaccuracies in all sections of
The Sunday Times should be
addressed to complaints@
sunday-times.co.uk or
Complaints, The Sunday
Times, 1 London Bridge Street,
London SE1 9GF. In addition,
the Independent Press
Standards Organisation
(Ipso) will examine formal
complaints about editorial
content in UK newspapers
and magazines. Please go to
our website for full details of
how to lodge a complaint.
Private schools
gave right grades
Your article “Private schools
‘gamed’ Covid rules to give
their pupils more top A-
levels” (News, last week) is
untrue and undermines the
results achieved by hard-
working pupils.
Ofqual analysed all results
and said: “Exam boards ...
did not find that any type of
school or college was more
likely than others to have
provided grades that did not
reflect the standard of their
students’ work.”
Every school had to
compile a portfolio of
evidence supporting grading
decisions, and those whose
grade profile was unexpected
were investigated. Very few
schools of any type were
asked to change grades,
because the results were
judged to be fair.
Having endured such
disruption, pupils need to be
able to move forward with
confidence in the grades they
have achieved.
Julie Robinson, chief executive,
Independent Schools Council;
Donna Stevens, chief
executive, Girls’ Schools
Association; Simon Hyde,
general secretary,
Headmasters’ and
Headmistresses’ Conference;
Rudolf Eliott Lockhart, chief
executive, Independent
Schools Association; and four
others
Price of integrity
I am appalled, but not
surprised, by your report on
grade inflation at private
schools. In contrast, at the
Colchester Sixth Form College
we stuck with great integrity
to the principles dictated to
us by Ofqual — that we should
adhere as closely as possible
to grades awarded in the
previous two years.
There is no “levelling-up”
in education — just the
opposite. This abuse of
privilege in education closely
mirrors what is happening in
No 10 right now.
David Huggon, newly retired
head of Spanish at Colchester
SFC, Wivenhoe, Essex
Fair game
The claim that teachers in
independent schools gamed
the system is a disgraceful
slur, and the claim that
candidates from private
schools were favoured is not
borne out by the statistics.
However, it is possible that
independent schools were
fortunate to be able to
minimise learning loss more
effectively during lockdowns.
That is not gaming the
system; it is doing a good job.
Leo Winkley, headmaster
Shrewsbury School
Shrewsbury
Don’t reward the
Taliban for failing
David Miliband is wrong to
suggest that the West should
resume financial support for
Afghanistan (World News, last
week). What were the Taliban
fighting for if not to govern
their own country? Did they
seriously believe the West
would continue to finance
Miliband’s millions
Miliband’s article would have
more credibility if he
addressed the fact that, as
boss of the International
Rescue Committee, he is on a
salary of about $1 million. It
does not look good when a
charity claiming we are not
doing our bit pays its leader
such an excessive amount.
Campbell Dunn
Bishop’s Stortford
Letters should arrive by
midday on Thursday. We may
edit letters, which must be
exclusive to The Sunday Times