THE ROMANTIC FALLACY
85beappropriate. On asubduedscale,andhiddenin
agarden,itmaybepleasantenough
;butthen, tobevisitedandnotlivedin. Atatheatricalmoment
itwillberight. Itmaybegay
;itmaybecurious.
Butit is unfitted, aesthetically,forthe normalusesoftheart,forit fatigues theattention; andarchi-tecture onceagain is insistent,dominating and nottobeescaped.!fr- The
practiceofthe Renaissancewascontrolled,ifnotbythisreasonedprinciple,atleastbyaninstinc-tivesenseforitsapplication. Evenin
thepicture—
sincethis,/too,musthaveitsmeasureofattention—
the'picturesque'elementis madesubordinate
;it issubduedtothat widercomposition oflineandtoneand colour whichcontains it.\ And the complete
pictureitselfis,orshouldbe,subordinateoncemoretothe formalscheme of thearchitecture, whereitfills an appointed place.Consequently, the*acci-dental'element, in the final result,is adequatelysubmerged withinthe formal; it gives, withoutinsistence,thecharmofstrangenessandvarietytoageneralideawhichitisnotsufferedtoconfuse.',yThis theRenaissance allowed
;but theRenais-sancewentfurther. Itwasnotonlyinpaintingthatthepicturesquecouldbefavourablyincluded;itwasnot onlyin its farms andhill-town buildings, pic-torialastheirbeauty
is. TheRenaissance
endedby
reconcilingthepicturesquewith classic architecture