THE ROMANTIC FALLACY
87gances
of design were neither unconsidered norinconsistent. Itintellectualisedthe
picturesgue.jThatthebaroquestyleshould besupremein thegardenandinthetheatre-—the
twoprovinceswhichpermitdesignitsgreatestliberty—
wastobeexpected.ThefountainsandcaryatidesofCaprarola,thestage
conceptionsof BibbienaandAndrea Pozzo, areun-surpassed. But thebaroque could satisfy no lesstheconditionsofamonumentalandapermanentart.Thecolonnade ofSt. Peter's, Bernini's St. Andrea,
the Salute atVenice, thefront of the Lateran, are'exciting'architecture: theystartlethe attention
;theyhavethevivid,pictorialuseoflightandshade;thestimulusoftheireffectissharp. Inallthistheyachievetheimmediatemeritofthepicturesque.Yettheir last and permanentimpression is,of abroadserenity
;fortheyhavethatbaroqueassurancewhicheven baroqueconvulsion cannot-rob of its repose.They are fit for
permanence; forthey have thatmassive finality of thoughtwhich, when we live
besidethem,we
donotquestion,butaccept.Here,then,inthepaintingandarchitectureoftheRenaissance,isanexampleofthefiteniploymentofthepicturesque. Butthese restrictions were not..'destinedtoberespected.
wThecultofNature,
byitsnecessaryhostilitytoconvention,modifiedthetreat-ment of thepicturesque and destroyedin it those