CHAPTER IV
THE
MECHANICALFALLACY
Such,in
broadoutline,werethe
tendencies,andsuch,
for architecture,
the results, of the
criticism which
drew itsinspirationfrom
the Romantic
Movement.
Very
different in its
origins, more plausible
in its
reasoning,but
in itsissuenolessmisleading,
isthe
schooloftheorybywhich
thiscriticismwas
succeeded.
Not
poetry butscience, not
sentiment butcalcula-
tion,isnowthe
misleadinginfluence. Itwas
impos-
sible
thatthe epoch ofmechanical
inventionwhich
followed,
with singular exactness, the
close of the
Renaissance tradition,
should be without
its effect
infixingthepointofviewfromwhich
thattradition
wasregarded. Thefundamentalconceptions
ofthe
time were themselves dictated
by the scientific
investigationsforwhichitbecame
distinguished.
Everyactivityinlife,andeventhe philosophy
of
lifeitself, wasinterpreted by the methodwhich,
in
one
particular field,had proved sofruitful. Every
aspectofthingswhicheludedmechanical
explanation
becamedisregarded,orwasevenforcedby
violence
into mechanical terms. For it was
an axiom of
81