CHAPTER IV
THEMECHANICALFALLACYSuch,in
broadoutline,werethetendencies,andsuch,for architecture,
the results, of thecriticism whichdrew itsinspirationfrom
the RomanticMovement.Verydifferent in itsorigins, more plausiblein itsreasoning,butin itsissuenolessmisleading,istheschooloftheorybywhich
thiscriticismwassucceeded.Notpoetry butscience, notsentiment butcalcula-tion,isnowthe
misleadinginfluence. Itwasimpos-sible
thatthe epoch ofmechanicalinventionwhichfollowed,with singular exactness, theclose of theRenaissance tradition,should be withoutits effectinfixingthepointofviewfromwhichthattraditionwasregarded. Thefundamentalconceptionsofthetime were themselves dictatedby the scientificinvestigationsforwhichitbecamedistinguished.Everyactivityinlife,andeventhe philosophyoflifeitself, wasinterpreted by the methodwhich,inoneparticular field,had proved sofruitful. Everyaspectofthingswhicheludedmechanicalexplanationbecamedisregarded,orwasevenforcedbyviolenceinto mechanical terms. For it wasan axiom of81