THEMECHANICAL
FALLACY
97
intermittentbuttressinghadsolved
theconstructive
problemwhichhadpuzzledthe
architectsofthenorth
ever since they had set out to vault the Roman
basilica. Theevolutionofthe
Gothicstylehadbeen,
onemight
almostsay,thepredestinedprogressof
that
constructiveinvention. Theclimax
ofitseffort,and
itsliteralcollapse,
atBeauvais,wassimplytheclimax
andthe collapse of aconstructive experiment
con-
tinuously prolonged. In no
architecture in the
worldhadso
manyfeatures
shownamoreevidently
constructive origin,or retained a moreconstructive
purpose, than
in the Gothic. The shafts
which
clusteredsorichly
in
the
naves
wereeachanecessary
and
separatearticulation in thestructuralscheme
;
dividing
themselvesintothedelicatetraceries
ofthe
roof,constructionisstilltheircontrollingaim. The
Greekstyle
alonecouldshowaconstructivebasis
as
defined
;
and,fora
generationinterestedin
mechani-
cal
ingenuity, the Gothic had this advantage over
theGreek,thatits
constructionwasdynamic
rather
thanstatic,
and,byconsequence,at
once
moredaring
and more
intricate. Thus, Gothic, remote,fanciful,
and
mysterious, was,at
thesametime,exact,
calcu-
lated, and
mechanical: the
triumph
of science no
less than the
incarnation of romance. In direct
contrast
with this stood
the architecture of
the
Renaissance.
\^Here was astyle which, as we have
seen, had
subordinated, deliberately and without
Q