THEMECHANICAL
FALLACY
97intermittentbuttressinghadsolved
theconstructive
problemwhichhadpuzzledthe
architectsofthenorthever since they had set out to vault the Roman
basilica. Theevolutionofthe
Gothicstylehadbeen,onemight
almostsay,thepredestinedprogressof
thatconstructiveinvention. Theclimax
ofitseffort,anditsliteralcollapse,
atBeauvais,wassimplytheclimaxandthe collapse of aconstructive experiment
con-tinuously prolonged. In no
architecture in theworldhadsomanyfeatures
shownamoreevidentlyconstructive origin,or retained a moreconstructivepurpose, thanin the Gothic. The shafts
whichclusteredsorichlyin
thenaves
wereeachanecessaryandseparatearticulation in thestructuralscheme;dividingthemselvesintothedelicatetraceries
oftheroof,constructionisstilltheircontrollingaim. The
Greekstylealonecouldshowaconstructivebasis
asdefined
;and,foragenerationinterestedin
mechani-calingenuity, the Gothic had this advantage overtheGreek,thatitsconstructionwasdynamic
ratherthanstatic,and,byconsequence,at
once
moredaringand moreintricate. Thus, Gothic, remote,fanciful,andmysterious, was,atthesametime,exact,
calcu-lated, andmechanical: thetriumph
of science noless than theincarnation of romance. In directcontrastwith this stoodthe architecture of
theRenaissance.\^Here was astyle which, as we haveseen, had
subordinated, deliberately and withoutQ