THE MECHANICAL
FALLACY iii
what was the alternative.
Greek architecture was
simply templearchitecture. Here, architecturalart
wasdealingwithautilitarian
problemsosimplethat
nogreatinconveniencewasencounteredinadjusting
itsnecessaryforms
toitsdesired aestheticcharacter.Norwasthereanyincongruitybetweentheaestheticand practical requirements of a Gothic cathedral.But the moment mediaeval building, of which the
scientific criticism thinks so highly, attempted toenlargeitsscope,itwascompelled
tosacrificegeneraldesign to practical convenience, and was therebyusuallyprecludedfromsecuringanyaestheticqualitybutthepicturesque.Andeven
soit achievedonlyavery moderate amount of practical convenience.Nowthe
Renaissancearchitecture
hadtosupplytheutilitarian needs of a still more varied and morefastidious life.Had it remained
tied to the idealof so-called constructive sincerity, which means nomorethananarbitraryinsistence
thatthestructuraland artistic necessities of architecture should besatisfiedbyoneandthesameexpedient,itssearchforstructuralbeautywouldhavebeenhamperedateveryturn.And,sincethisdilemmawasobvioustoeveryone, noone was offended by the means taken toovercomeit.Andnot
only
wasthepracticalrange
ofarchitec-turethusextendedwithoutlosstoitsaestheticscope,but that scope itself was vastlyenlarged. In
the