THE MECHANICAL
FALLACY iii
what was the alternative.
Greek architecture was
simply templearchitecture. Here, architecturalart
wasdealingwithautilitarian
problemsosimplethat
nogreatinconveniencewasencounteredinadjusting
itsnecessaryforms
toitsdesired aestheticcharacter.
Norwasthereanyincongruitybetweentheaesthetic
and practical requirements of a Gothic cathedral.
But the moment mediaeval building, of which the
scientific criticism thinks so highly, attempted to
enlarge
itsscope,itwascompelled
tosacrificegeneral
design to practical convenience, and was thereby
usuallyprecludedfromsecuringanyaestheticquality
butthepicturesque.
Andeven
soit achievedonly
a
very moderate amount of practical convenience.
Nowthe
Renaissancearchitecture
hadtosupplythe
utilitarian needs of a still more varied and more
fastidious life.
Had it remained
tied to the ideal
of so-called constructive sincerity, which means no
morethananarbitrary
insistence
thatthestructural
and artistic necessities of architecture should be
satisfiedby
oneandthesameexpedient,itssearchfor
structuralbeautywouldhavebeenhamperedatevery
turn.
And,sincethisdilemmawasobvioustoevery
one, noone was offended by the means taken to
overcomeit.
Andnot
only
was
thepracticalrange
of
architec-
turethusextendedwithoutlosstoitsaestheticscope,
but that scope itself was vastly
enlarged. In
the