The architecture of humanism; a study in the history of taste

120 THE ARCHITECTURE

OF HUMANISM

donotexpress

themselvesinour terms,i They

arg^

notpowerfuloverusfor

delight.

^^.^u^S*iXid

In

proportion asthese differences became

'distin-

!

guished,theart

ofarchitecturewasbound

todetach/

itself from

mechanical science.

The

art

of archi-^

tecture

studies notstructureinitself, butthe

effect

of structure

on the human spirit. Empirically,

by

intuition and example, it learns where to discard,

wheretoconceal,

wheretoemphasise,and

whereto

imitate, the facts of construction. It creates, by

degrees, a

humanised dynamics. For

that task,

constructive science

is a usefulslave,

and perhaps

a natural ally, but certainly ablind master.

The

builders

of

theRenaissancegavearchitecture

forthe

first time a wholly

conscious

liberty of aim, and

releaseditfrommechanicalsubservience. To

recall

theartofarchitecturetothatobedienceistoreverse

a natural process, and cast away its opportunity.

The Mechanical Fallacy, in its zeal for structure,

refuses,inthearchitectureoftheRenaissance,an

art

where structure is raised

to the

ideal.

It looks in

rpoetryforthesyntaxofanakedprose.