THE
ETHICAL
FALLACY
123
asrelevant
toarchitectural
taste? Howfaronits
own
principlesdiditestablish
acaseagainst
Renaissance
architecture
? Andcanthose
principlesfindplaceat
allinarationalaesthetic
? These arethe
questions
whichnowrequire
solution,ifweare
toguardagainst,
ordojusticeto,astill
powerfulfactorincontemporary
taste. For although
few seriousstudents
ofarchi-
tecturewouldnowconfess
themselvesRuskinian,and
nonewould
endorsethosegrandanathemas
without
reserve, the phrases of Ruskin's
currency are not!
extinct. In milder language, certainly,
but with
even lesssense
thatsuch ideasrequireargumentor
proof,theaxiomsarereiterated: architectureisstill
the
'
distinctivelypolitical
'art,itsvirtue,to
'
reflect
a
nationalaspiration,'and allthe faultsandmerits
ofaclassornationareseenreflectedinthearchitec-
turethatservestheiruse.^
>
Itissignificantofthenowaxiomaticcharacterofsuchideas
that
wefindthemincludedbycourtesyintheworksofwriterswhoseactual
biasandmethodareutterlyopposedtotheethical. ThusProfessorMoore,
inoneofthefewvolumeswhichhavebeendevotedtoconsidering
Renaissancearchitectureasadistinctiveart,baseshiswholetreatment
quiteconsistentlyuponamechanicalidealofarchitecture: anideal
inwhichamostscholarlystudyof
Gothic
hasnodoubtconfirmedhim.
Fitnessof
construction
is
hissoleandinvariable
testofvalue. Not
oneword
occurs
throughoutwith
regard
to
anysingle
buildingabout
thekindof
humancharacteritindicatesorpromotes. Yet
heprefaces
thisscientificwork,notbyanydeclarationofmechanicalfaith,but
byarapidliturgical
recitationofalltheethicalformulae.
'
The
fine
arts,'he
says,
'
derivetheirwholecharacter'from
'
thehistoricalante-
cedents,
moral conditions.. .and religious beliefsofthepeoples
andepochs
to
whichtheybelong'(theaestheticsenseofapeople
apparentlycontributesnothingtothe
characteroftheirwork)
:
'
Into