132
THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
Butthenew
criticismdidnotlimit
itselfto
denunci-
ation. A nioral code, at
once eloquent and exact,
wasfurnished
forthearchitect'sguidance
and
defence,
anddetermined
the
'
universalandeasilyapplicable
lawof
right'forbuttressandcapital,
aperture,
arch-
line and shaft.
An immense storeof learning
and
research, ofreason also,
and sensitive
analysis, far
superior
tothat which Ruskinbroughttopainting,
lay imbedded in
these splendid admonitions,
and
seemedtoconfirmthemoralthesis. Anditnodoubt
addedgreatlytothe
plausibilityofthe
casethatthe
principleswhich hepresentedwiththe thunder
and
pageantry
ofan Apocalypse had been carried
out,
from foundation to
cornice,
in almost meticulous
detail. Impressiveprinciplesofright! They
could
be fitted to
every case,and as we read
wecannot
butsuspectthattheyareabletoestablishanycon-
clusion.
The
moralistjccriticismoftheartsismore
ancient,
moreprofound,andmightbemoreconvincing,than
the particular expression which Ruskin
gave to it.
It is not specifically Christian. It dominates the
fourth book of Plato's Republic no less than
the
gospel of Savonarola. It is one of
the recurrent
phasesofmen'sthought: a latenttendency
which
it was Ruskin's mission rather to
re-awaken than
create. Theethicalcriticism
ofarchitectureislikely
therefore to survive the decay of
the individual