132THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
Butthenew
criticismdidnotlimititselfto
denunci-ation. A nioral code, at
once eloquent and exact,wasfurnishedforthearchitect'sguidanceand
defence,anddeterminedthe'universalandeasilyapplicablelawofright'forbuttressandcapital,aperture,
arch-line and shaft.An immense storeof learning
andresearch, ofreason also,and sensitive
analysis, farsuperiortothat which Ruskinbroughttopainting,lay imbedded inthese splendid admonitions,
andseemedtoconfirmthemoralthesis. Anditnodoubt
addedgreatlytotheplausibilityofthe
casethattheprincipleswhich hepresentedwiththe thunder
andpageantryofan Apocalypse had been carried
out,from foundation tocornice,
in almost meticulousdetail. Impressiveprinciplesofright! They
couldbe fitted toevery case,and as we read
wecannot
butsuspectthattheyareabletoestablishanycon-clusion.The
moralistjccriticismoftheartsismore
ancient,moreprofound,andmightbemoreconvincing,thanthe particular expression which Ruskin
gave to it.It is not specifically Christian. It dominates thefourth book of Plato's Republic no less than
thegospel of Savonarola. It is one of
the recurrent
phasesofmen'sthought: a latenttendency
whichit was Ruskin's mission rather to
re-awaken than
create. Theethicalcriticism
ofarchitectureislikelytherefore to survive the decay of
the individual