146THEARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
mediaevalmanner,oramodelsettlementinthedemo-craticmanner,hispaganpleasureand his pietyareequallytoseek.Here, indeed, isthefallacyofthewriters ofthisschool: an idealisedmedisevalism
iscontrastedwithasharplyrealisticpictureofRenais-sance architecture in modern life: the historicalRenaissance, the historical Gothic, they are at nopains to reconstruct. Conducted without imparti-ality, argumentssuch asthesearebutthe romance
of
criticism
;
they can intensify and decorate ourprejudices,butcannotrenderthemconvincing. Even
so,anddidtheyprovetheircase,thesuperiorworth
of
asocietymightjustifythechoice,butwouldnot
provethemeritofthestyleofarchitecturewhichthat
societyimposed. The
aestheticvalueofstylewouldstillremain
tobediscussed. Oristhat,too,upona
dueanalysis, within the province ofanethical
per-
ception? Thatisthequestionwhichstillremains.
IllThelastphaseofethicalcriticismhas
atleastthismerit, thatitstrikes atarchitecture,
notitssetting.
Ittakesthekernel
fromitsshellbeforepronouncing
upontaste.
Therearethose who claima
directperception inarchitecturalforms
ofmoralflavours. ^Theysay,for
example, of
thebaroque (for
although such hostile
judgmentsare passed upon
the whole Renaissance,