THE ETHICAL
FALLACY
149example, might have given them
—
^was thus not anegative neglect, but a positive demand. Their
*inexactness'was
anecessaryinvention.
Further—
againforthesuggestionofstrength—thescaleshould
belarge
;andhence,
sincearoughtexturemaintainsalargerscale thanasmooth, aninexactfinish waspreferredtoonemoreperfect. Last,forthequalityofexultation: forvigour notlatent butinaction;for vigour,so to speak, atplay. Tocommunicate
thisthebaroquearchitects conceived
ofMovement,tossingandreturning
;movementunrestrained, yet
notdestructiveofthatessentialreposewhichcomesfrom composition,norexhaustiveofthatreserve
ofenergy implied in masses, when, as here, theyaretrulyandsignificantlymassed. Butsincethearchi-tecture itself
doesnot move, andthe movement is
in
ourattention,drawnhereandtherebythedesign,held andliberated by its stressand accent, every-thing mustdepend uponthe kind ofattention thedesign invites. An attention that is
restrained,howeverworthily,attheseveralpointsofthedesign;anattentionatclose focusandsuppliedbywhatitseeswith
asatisfyinginterest; anattentionwhichisnotledon,wouldyieldnoparamountsenseofmove-ment. Strengththeremightbe,butnot
overflowingstrength
;
therewouldbeno sense ofstrength'atplay.' Forthisreasonthere
existinbaroquearchi-tecture
rhythm
and direction andstress,
butno