i62THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
Thereis,infact,atrue,notafalse,analogybetweenethical and aestheticvalues: the correspondence[between them may even amount
to an identity.The'dignity'ofarchitectureisthe same'dignity'Ithatwerecogniseincharacter. Thus,whenoncewehavediscerned it aesthetically inarchitecture,theremayariseintheminditsmoralecho. Buttheecho
isdependentontheevokingsound
;andthesoundin this case is the original voice of architecture,whoselanguageisMass,Space,Line,andCoherence,jThese arequalities in
architecture which requireagift for their understanding and a trained gift fortheirunderstandingaright: qualitiesinwhichmenI
werenot 'intended
without excessive difficulty toknowgoodthingsfrombad,'andbynomeanstobe
estimatedbytheself-confident
scrutinyofanethicalconscience;qualities, nevertheless, so closelyalliedto certain valueswe attach to life,
thatwhenoncethe aesthetic judgment has
perceived them rightly,thevitalconscience
mustapprove,andbyapprovingcan enrich. To
refuse this enrichment,
ormoralecho, of
aesthetic'valuesis one
fallacy
;the fallacy,,ofthecriticsofFact.Toimaginethatbecausethe
'conscience
'canenrich
thosevalues
ithas,onthataccount, the
slightest power,with itsown eyes,to
seethem,
isthecontrary,
theEthicalFallacy
oftaste.Moralitydeepens
thecontent
ofarchitecturalex-perience. But
architecture
in its turn can extend