i66 THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
was alive. Style itself, and not
the succession of
styles, engrossed
men's thought. The sequence, as
a sequence, was not studied.
But when, in the
nineteenthcentury, thesequence
wascutshortand
a period of
*
revivals
' wasinitiated, the standards
of taste weremultiplied and
confused
;
pastthings
became
contemporary with present. Sequence—the
historicalrelationofstyleto
style—nowwasstudied,
when sequence itselfhad ceased tobe.
Ifthedif-
ferent
stages of
a
historical evolution are brought
simultaneouslytolife—^ifonlytothe
lifeofchattering
spectres—style no longer can affirm its
rights un-
questioned. Claims that once
were owned must
then beadjusted,challenged andcompared.
When
architecture,once a cleardirectingvoice,isheard
to
speak
'
with tongues' forgotten and confused, men
must hearken for interpretation, and
find it, then,
inthesoundofeverypassinggustofthought.
Threesuchsounds
inthewindwerethosewehave
examined,eachofthembornefromasource
remote
from architecture itself. Poetical enthusiasm, the
zeal
andcuriosityofscience,theawakenedstirofa
socialconscience,arevoicesinthecriticism
ofarchi-
tecturestill
tobe
discerned. Butthephilosophyof
evolution—vastinitssweep,universalinits
seeming
efficacy,andnowlessaninstrumentof sciencethan
anatural process of the unconsciousmind
—
^was
a
steadier wind more strong than these. What
has