THEACADEMIC
TRADITION 207
'ajudiciousmixtureofOrder
andVariety';andthisdefinition,forwantofabetter,hasbeen
a
thousandtimesrepeated. The
emendationassistsuslittle,foronthenatureofthe'judicious'nolightisthrown,savethatitliesinameanbetween thetoomuchon
theonehand,andthetoolittleontheother. And,bya
stillmorefatal
oversight,itisnotobservedthatalmosteverypossiblegradationoforderandvarietyis found among things admittedly beautiful, and
no less among things admittedly ugly. A certain
minimumoforderis implied in all design,good or
bad
;but, giventhis, itis clear that whatsatisfiestheeyeisnotOrder,noraratiobetweenOrderandVariety,butbeautiful Orderand beautiful Variety,and
theseinalmostanycombination.Order,itisallowed,bringsintelligibility; itassistsour thought. But the act of quickly and clearlyperceiving uglinessdoes not becomemore pleasantbecause
itisquick,northeuglinessbeautifulbecauseitisevident
;andordercombinedwithugUnessservesbut
torender
thatuglinessmoreobviousandtostampitgloomilyuponthemind.So, too, with proportion-. Theattempt has con-
stantly been made to
discover exact mathematicalsequences in beautiful buildings asthough theirpresence
werelikelyeithertocausebeautyorexplainit. Theintervalsofavulgartunearenotlessmathe-maticalthan those ofnoble music, andthe propor-