224
THE
ARCHITECTUREOF
HUMANISM
it,havethesense
ofaperpetuallythwarted
instinct
of
movement. The arrangement
of the scheme is
imperfectly
humanised. It may be
picturesque, it
may be useful, it may be
mechanically superior
;
butit
isatvariancewithourideal
movement. And
beautyof
dispositionin architecture,like beautyof
line,arisesfromourownphysical
experienceofeasy
movementinspace.
Butnotallmovements
arepleasantorunpleasant
inthemselves
;
themajorityofthemare
indifferent.
Nevertheless/^ series of suggested movements, in
themselvesindifferent,mayawaken
inus
anexpect-
ancyandconsequentdesireofsomefurthermovement;
and ifthespacesofarchitecturearesoarranged as
firsttoawakenandthenfalsifythisexpectation,we
haveugliness.\Forexample,ifadesignbeobviously
.based onsymmetryand accustoms us toa rhythm
of equal movements
—
^as in the case of a typical
eighteenth-century
house—
and one
of the windows
wereplacedoutoflineandlowerthanthe rest,we_
shouldfeeldiscomfort. Theoffence
wouldlieagainst
oursenseofamovement,which,whenitreachesthat
pointof a design, is compelled to
dropoutof step
and
to
dip againstitswill.
Yetthe-relationofthe
windowtoitsimmediatelysurroundingformsmight
notinitselfbenecessarilyugly.
A converse instancemay here begiven-. Classic
design—the style which in Italy
culminated
in