224THE
ARCHITECTUREOF
HUMANISM
it,havethesenseofaperpetuallythwartedinstinctofmovement. The arrangementof the scheme isimperfectlyhumanised. It may be
picturesque, itmay be useful, it may be
mechanically superior;butitisatvariancewithouridealmovement. And
beautyofdispositionin architecture,like beautyofline,arisesfromourownphysical
experienceofeasymovementinspace.
Butnotallmovementsarepleasantorunpleasantinthemselves
;themajorityofthemareindifferent.Nevertheless/^ series of suggested movements, inthemselvesindifferent,mayawaken
inus
anexpect-ancyandconsequentdesireofsomefurthermovement;and ifthespacesofarchitecturearesoarranged asfirsttoawakenandthenfalsifythisexpectation,wehaveugliness.\Forexample,ifadesignbeobviously.based onsymmetryand accustoms us toa rhythm
of equal movements—
^as in the case of a typicaleighteenth-centuryhouse—
and one
of the windowswereplacedoutoflineandlowerthanthe rest,we_shouldfeeldiscomfort. Theoffence
wouldlieagainstoursenseofamovement,which,whenitreachesthat
pointof a design, is compelled to
dropoutof stepand
todip againstitswill.
Yetthe-relationofthewindowtoitsimmediatelysurroundingformsmightnotinitselfbenecessarilyugly.A converse instancemay here begiven-. Classic
design—the style which in Italy
culminatedin