ARTAND
THOUGHT
259Further, Renaissance
architecture was
essentiallyan architecture of
experiment. Otherstyles—the
Greek,for
example—
^would reveal
sestheticpurposeclearly conceived, minutely
carried out. But
nootherstylewasso
adventurousasthe
Italian,orsovaried in its attempt. The
humanist conviction'thateveryvalue isagood
tobe explored,'led inRenaissance architecture toa perpetual
shifting intheaimofitsdesign. Itcastson
thestudyofstylealightthatfallsfromever-changingangles.But,mostvaluable ofall,this
richness ofexperi-ment was conductedwithin
astrictly limited con-vention. No aestheticpurposes could wellbe more
divergent thanthoseof Bramanteand
Bernini,yetthey employed a single speech. They used the
Orders. This classical inheritance the
Renaissancearchitects perceived to benot
an obstructive andcapriciousimposition,butalanguage. Theelement
offixitywhichtheOrdersimpartedtoarchitecturaldesignwasnomoretoberebelled againstthantheelement of fixity which languagegives
tospeech.TheOrderswerealong-developedinstrument fittogiveclarityto
sharpideas,howevervaried,offunctionandofform. Throughtheiragencythe mindtran-
scribes itself the
more readily into the structuralterms of the design, identifies itself
with its scale,respondstoits
dynamics. ThattheexperimentsofRenaissancearchitecturewere