ARTAND
THOUGHT
259
Further, Renaissance
architecture was
essentially
an architecture of
experiment. Other
styles—the
Greek,
for
example
—
^would reveal
sestheticpurpose
clearly conceived, minutely
carried out. But
no
other
stylewasso
adventurousasthe
Italian,orso
varied in its attempt. The
humanist conviction
'
thateveryvalue isagood
tobe explored,'led in
Renaissance architecture toa perpetual
shifting in
theaimofitsdesign. Itcastson
thestudyofstyle
alightthatfallsfromever-changingangles.
But,
mostvaluable ofall,this
richness ofexperi-
ment was conducted
within
astrictly limited con-
vention. No aestheticpurposes could wellbe more
divergent than
thoseof Bramanteand
Bernini,yet
they employed a single speech. They used the
Orders. This classical inheritance the
Renaissance
architects perceived to be
not
an obstructive and
capriciousimposition,butalanguage. Theelement
offixitywhichtheOrdersimpartedtoarchitectural
designwasnomoretoberebelled againstthanthe
element of fixity which language
gives
to
speech.
TheOrderswerealong-developedinstrument fitto
giveclarityto
sharpideas,howevervaried,offunction
andofform. Throughtheiragencythe mindtran-
scribes itself the
more readily into the structural
terms of the design, identifies itself
with its scale,
respondstoits
dynamics. Thattheexperimentsof
Renaissancearchitecturewere