RENAISSANCE
ARCHITECTURE
23
orimposed continuitysuch
as thatwhich, later, in
the France of Louis xiv., gave to
architecture a
formalandrestrictedaim.
Itneededthepatronage
ofalargeidea,butitrequiredalsospaceandscope,
thatitmightattempteverymode
ofself-realisation
yetstand
committed
tonone. Thisspace,andthis
patronage, the papacy was fitted
toprovide. The
rivalry
of
successivepopes,theirdiverseoriginsand
sympathies, their common passion to leave
behind
them
an
enduringmonumentof
theirpower; above
all, their detached office, controlling the different
statesofItalyandforcingeachofthem tobringits
ownartistictemperamentwithinthespellofRome,
gavearchitecture, inperfectcombination, thefocus
^ndtheliberty,thevariedimpulseandthe renewed
vitality necessary for making
a
great
imaginative
experimentwilder
theinfluenceoftheantique.
The papacy, then,
may
be considered to have
predetermined in some degree the formation of
Renaissancestyle. Yetwemustnotexaggerate its
contribution.
Byitsimperialqualityitwillappear
tohave furnished the
large
ideato which the
new
classic architecture
mightstand inservice. Butwe
mustnot overlook
theextent towhich the papacy
wasitselfindebted,forthatquality,
totheartistsof
theRenaissance.
Itisacommonfallacytoaccount
forartistic
expressionby
externalconditionsforwhose
verybeing
thatexpressionisinsome
casesresponsible,