RENAISSANCE
ARCHITECTURE
23orimposed continuitysuch
as thatwhich, later, in
the France of Louis xiv., gave to
architecture aformalandrestrictedaim.
Itneededthepatronage
ofalargeidea,butitrequiredalsospaceandscope,thatitmightattempteverymode
ofself-realisationyetstandcommitted
tonone. Thisspace,andthispatronage, the papacy was fittedtoprovide. The
rivalryof
successivepopes,theirdiverseoriginsandsympathies, their common passion to leave
behindthem
anenduringmonumentof
theirpower; aboveall, their detached office, controlling the differentstatesofItalyandforcingeachofthem tobringitsownartistictemperamentwithinthespellofRome,
gavearchitecture, inperfectcombination, thefocus^ndtheliberty,thevariedimpulseandthe renewedvitality necessary for making
agreat
imaginativeexperimentwildertheinfluenceoftheantique.The papacy, then,
may
be considered to havepredetermined in some degree the formation ofRenaissancestyle. Yetwemustnotexaggerate its
contribution.Byitsimperialqualityitwillappear
tohave furnished thelarge
ideato which thenew
classic architecturemightstand inservice. Butwe
mustnot overlooktheextent towhich the papacywasitselfindebted,forthatquality,totheartistsoftheRenaissance.Itisacommonfallacytoaccount
forartisticexpressionbyexternalconditionsforwhoseverybeingthatexpressionisinsomecasesresponsible,